https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/111769
標題: | Can the Web-Form WHOQOL-BREF be an Alternative to the Paper-Form? | 作者: | Chen, Wen-Ching Wang, Jung-Der Hwang, Jing-Shiang Chen, Chiao-Chicy Wu, Chia-huei KAI-PING GRACE YAO |
關鍵字: | Comparison;Reliability;Validity;Web version;WHOQOL-BREF | 公開日期: | 2009 | 卷: | 94 | 期: | 1 | 起(迄)頁: | 97-114 | 來源出版物: | SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH | 摘要: | The purpose of this study was to test whether the web version is an alternative to the paper version of the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF). Two studies were conducted. Study 1 used crossover self-controlled trials with 80 participants to compare the web and paper versions and to determine the test-retest reliability of the web version. Study 2 used data from 1,016 web participants to analyze the internal consistency and concurrent and construct validity of the web version. The correlations of domain scores between the web and paper versions ranged from 0.71 to 0.85. Dependent t tests showed no significant differences in domain scores between these two versions. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for test-retest reliability of web version ranged from 0.79 to 0.91. The Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.60 to 0.83. Multiple regression models indicated that the web version has good concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis ( CFA) for the second-order hierarchical factor model also supported the construct validity of the web version. The web version of the WHOQOL-BREF can be the alternative to the paper version for health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) evaluation. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/173421 http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/173421/1/61.pdf |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11205-008-9355-z |
顯示於: | 環境與職業健康科學研究所 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。