dc.relation.reference | ANDERSSON, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princetion,
New Jersey.
BEUTTEL, K., and J. B. LOSOS. 1999. Ecological morphology of Caribbean anoles.
Herpetological Monographs. 13 1-28.
BJORNDAL, K. A., A. B. BOLTEN, C. J. LAGUEUX, and D. R. JACKSON. 1997.
Dietary overlap in three sympatric congeneric freshwater turtles (Pseudemys) in
Florida. Chel. Conserv. Biol. 2:430-433.
BOOKSTEIN, F. L. 1989. Size and shape: A comment on semantics. Systematic
Zoology. 38:173-180.
BULL, C. M., and Y. PAMULA. 1996. Sexually dimorphic head sizes and
reproductive success in the sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa. Journal of Zoology.
240.
BUTLER, M. A., and J. B. LOSOS. 2002. Multivariate sexual dimorphism, sexual
selection, and adaptation in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Ecological
Monographs. 72:541-559.
BUTLER, M. A., T. W. SCHOENER, and J. B. LOSOS. 2000. The relationship between
sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards.
Evolution. 54:259-272.
CENSKY, E. J. 1997. Female mate choice in the non-territorial lizard Ameiva plei
(Teiidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobol. 40:221-225.
CHEN, R.-H. 1989. Relationships between testosterone and reproductive cycle of Japalura mitsukurii formosensis., p. 71. Institute of Biology. Tunghai university, Taichung.
COOPER, W. E. J., and L. J. VITT. 1989. Sexual dimorphism of head and body size
in an iguanid lizard; paradoxical results. Am. Nat. 133:729-735.
—. 1993. Female mate choice of large male broad-headed skinks. Anim. Behav.
45:683-693.
COX, R. M., S. L. SKELLY, and H. B. JOHN-ALDER. 2003. A comparative study of
adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution. 57:1653-
1669.
DUVALL, D., and S. J. BEAUPRE. 1998. Sexual strategy and size dimorphism in
rattlesnakes: integrating proximate and ultimate causation. Amer. Zool. 38:152-
165.
FANCHIANG, W.-L. 1995. Diet and stomach contents analysis of the tree lizard (Japalura polygonata xanthostoma Ota,1991) in Taipei., p. 76. In: Graduate Institute of Plant Pathology and Entomology. National Taiwan University, Taipei.
FORSMAN, A., and L. E. LINDELL. 1993. The advantage of a big head: swallowing performance in adders, Vipera berus. Functional Ecology. 7:183-189.
GARLAND, T. J., and S. C. ADOLPH. 1994. Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiological Zoology. 67:797-828.
GOODALL, D. W. 1973. Sample similarity and species correlation., p. 106-156. In:
Ordination and classification of communities. R. H. Whittaker (ed.). Junk, The
Hague.
GOULD, S. J. 1975. Allometry in primates, with an emphasis on scaling and
evolution of the brain. Contributions to Primatology. 5:244-292.
GRANT, P. R. 1986. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton University Press, Princetion, New Jersey.
GRINNELL, J. 1917. The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk. 34: 427-433.
—. 1924. Geography and evolution. Ecology. 5: 225-229.
HERREL, A., R. VAN DAMME, and F. DE VREE. 1996. Testing the niche divergence
hypothesis by bite force analysis. Netherlands Journal of Zoology. 46:253-262.
HERREL, A., J. MEYERS, and B. VANHOOYDONCK. 2002. Relations between microhabitat use and limb shape in phrynosomatid lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 77 149-163.
HOFMANN, S., and K. HENLE. 2006. Male reproductive success and intrasexual
selection in the common lizard determmined by DNA-microsatellite. Journal of
Herpetology. 40:1-6.
HURLBERT, S. H. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives.
Ecology. 59:67-77.
HUTCHINSON, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22:415-427.
HUXLEY, J. S. 1924. Constant differential growth ratios and their significance.
Nature. 114:895.
IRSCHICK, D. J., E. CARLISLE, J. ELSTROTT, M. RAMOS, C. BUCKLEY, B.
VANHOOYDONCK, J. MEYERS, and A. HERREL. 2005a. A comparison of habitat
use, morphology, clinging performance and escape behavior among two
divergent green anole lizards (Anolis carolinensis) populations. Biological
Journal of the Linnean Society. 85:223-234.
IRSCHICK, D. J., and J. B. LOSOS. 1998. A comparative analysis of the ecological
significance of maximal locomotor performance in Caribbean Anolis lizards.
Evolution. 59: 219-226.
IRSCHICK, D. J., B. VANHOOYDONCK, A. HERREL, and J. MEYERS. 2005b.
Intraspecific correlations among morphology, performace and habitat use within
a green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis) populations. Biological Journal of the
Linnean Society. 85:211-221.
JENSSEN, T. A. 1973. Shifts in the structural habitat of Anolis opalinus due to
congeneric competition. Ecology. 54: 863-869.
JIAN, R.-C. 1990. Morphological variations of external structures of genus Japalura in Taiwan., p. 79. In: Institute of Biology. Tunghai University, Taichung.
JOHNSON, J. B., L. D. MCBRAYER, and D. SAENZ. 2005. Allometry, sexual size
dimorphism, and niche partitioning in the mediterranean gecko (Hemidactylus
turcicus). Southwestern Naturalist. 50:435-439.
KATSIKAROS, K., and R. SHINE. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the tusked frog,
Adelotus brevis (Anura:Myobatrachidae): the roles of natural and sexual
selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 60:39-51.
KOHLSDORF, T., T. J. GARLAND, and C. A. NAVAS. 2001. limb and tail lengths in relation to substrate usage in Tropidurus lizards. Journal of Morphology. 248:151-164.
LAUDER, G. V. 1983. Functional and morphological bases of trophic specialization in sunfishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Journal of Morphology. 178(1): 1-21.
LIN, J.-Y. 1979. Ovarian, fat body and liver cycles in the lizards, Japalura
swinhonis formosensis (Lacertilia: Agamidae). J. Asian Ecol. 1:29-38.
LIN, J.-Y., and K.-H. LU. 1982. Population ecology of the lizard Japalura
swinhonis formosensis (Sauria: Agamidae) in Taiwan. Copeia. 1982:425-434.
LIN, J.-Y., and H.-Y. CHENG. 1986. Annual reproductive and lipid storage patterns of the Agamid lizard, Japalura swinhonis mitsukurii in southern Taiwan. Bulletin of the Institute of Zoology, Academia Sinica. 25:13-23.
LINDEMAN, P. V. 2000. Evolution of the relative width of the head and alveolar
surfaces in map turtles (Testudines: Emydidae: Graptemys). Biological Journal
of the Linnean Society. 69:549-576.
LISTER, B. C. 1976. The nature of niche expansion in West Indian Anolis lizards. I:
ecological consequences of reduced competition. Evolution. 30: 659-676.
LIU, K.-C. 1994. Phylogeographic relationship of Japalura swinhonis based on analysis of mtDNA., p. 62. In: Institute of Life Science. National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung.
LOSOS, J. B. 1990. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of west
Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecological Monographs. 60:369-
388.
—. 1994. Integrative approaches to evolutionary ecology: Anolis lizards as model systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 25:467-493.
MACARTHUR, R. H. AND R. LEVINS. 1967. Limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101(921): 377-385.
MALHOTRA, A., and R. S. THORPE. 1997. Size and shape variation in the Lesser
Antillean anole, Anolis oculatus (Sauria: Iguanidae) in relation to habitat.
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 60:53-72.
MELVILLE, J., and R. SWAIN. 2000. Evolutionary relationships between morphology, performance and habitat openness in the lizard genus Niveoscincus (Scincidae: Lygosominae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 70:667-683.
MOSIMANN, J. 1970. Size allometry: size and shape variables with
characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. Journal
of the American Statistical Association. 65:930-945.
OLSSON, M., R. SHINE, E. WAPSTRA, B. UJVARI, and T. MADSEN. 2002. Sexual
dimorphism in lizard body shape: the role of sexual selection and fecundity
selection. Evolution. 56:1538-1542.
PIANKA, E. R. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 53-74.
PREEST, M. R. 1994. Sexual size dimorphism and feeding energetics in Anolis
carolinensis: why do females take smaller prey than males. Journal of
Herpetology. 28:292-298.
SCHLUTER, D. 1982. Seed and patch selection by Gal?pagos ground finches:
relation to foraging efficiency and food supply. Ecology. 63: 1106-1120.
—. 2003. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press, New York.
SCHLUTER, D., and P. R. GRANT. 1984. Determinants of morphological patterns in communities of Darwin's finches. American Naturalist. 123:175-196.
SCHOENER, T. W. 1969. Models of optimal size for solitary predators. Am. Nat.
103:277-313.
SCHULTE, J. A., J. B. LOSOS, F. B. CRUZ, and H. N??EZ. 2004. The relationship
between morphology, escape behaviour and microhabitat occupation in the
lizard clade Liolaemus (Iguanidae:Tropidurinae*:Liolaemini). Journal of
Evolutionary Biology. 17:408-420.
SCHWARZKOPF, L. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in body shape without sexual
dimorphism in body size in water skinks (Eulamprus quoyii). Herpetologica.
61:116-123.
SHAN, G. 2001. Natural portraits of lizards in Taiwan. Big Tree Culture Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taipei.
SHINE, R. 1992. Relative clutch mass and body shape in lizards and snakes: Is
reproductive investment constrained or optimized? Evolution. 46:828-833.
SMITH, E. P. 1982. Niche breath, resource availability and inference. Ecology.
63(6): 1675-1681.
STAMPS, J. A. 1993. Sexual size dimorphism in species with asymptotic growth
after maturity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 50:123-145.
THOMPSON, G. G., and P. C. WITHERS. 2005. Size-free shape differences between
male and female Westwern Australian dragon lizards (Agamidae). Amphibia-
Reptilia. 26:55-63.
VANHOOYDONCK, B., and R. VAN DAMME. 1999. Evolutionary relationships between body shape and habitat use in lacertid lizard. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:785-805.
VERWAIJEN, D., R. VAN DAMME, and A. HERREL. 2002. Relationships between
head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency and diet in two symaptric lacertid
lizards. Functional Ecology. 16:842-850.
VINCENT, S. E., A. HERREL, and D. J. IRSCHICK. 2004. Ontogeny of intersexual head shape and prey selection in the pitviper Agkistrodon piscivorus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 81:151-159.
VITT, L. J. 1983. Reproduction and sexual dimorphism in the tropical Teiid lizard
Cnemiphorus ocellifer. Copeia. 1983:359-366.
VITT, L. J., and J. D. CONGDON. 1978. Body shape, reproductive effort, and
relative clutch mass in lizards: Resolution of a paradox. Am. Nat. 112:595-608.
WAINWRIGHT, P. C. 1991. Ecomorphology: experimental functional anatomy for
ecological problems. American Zoologist. 31(4): 680-693.
WALKER, J. A. 1997. Ecological morphology of lacustrine threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L (Gasterosteidae) body shape. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 61:3-50.
WATKINS, G. G. 1996. Proximate causes of sexual size dimorphism in the Iguanian
lizard Microlophus occipitalis. Ecology. 77:1473-1482.
WEI, S.-Y., and J.-Y. LIN. 1981. Behavioral study of Japalura swinhonis
formosensis (Sauria: Agamidae). Tunghai Journal of Biology. 22:33-48 (in
Chinese).
WILLIAMS, E. E. 1972. The origin of faunas. Evolution of lizard congeners in a complex island fauna: a trial analysis. Evolutionary Biology. 6:47-89.
—. 1983. Ecomorphs, faunas, island size, and diverse end points in island radiations of Anolis, p. 326-370. In: Lizard Ecology: studies of a model organism. R. B. Huey, E. R. Pianka, and T. W. Schoener (eds.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
ZAAF, A., A. HERREL, P. AERTS, and F. DE VREE. 1999. Morphology of the
appendicular musculature in geckos with different locomotor habits (Lepidosauria). Zoomorphology. 119:9-22.
ZNARI, M., and E. E. MOUDEN. 1997. Seasonal changes in the diet of adult and
juvenile Agama impalearis (Lacertilia:Agamidae) in the central Jbilet mountains,
Morocco. Journal of Arid Environments. 37:403-412. | en |