https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/17305
標題: | 三家評《金瓶梅》析論 | 作者: | 陳翠英 | 關鍵字: | 《金瓶梅》;文龍;張竹坡;閱讀;批評主體;對話;Chin-P’ing-Mei;Wen -Long;Chang Chu-po;read;critic subject;dialogue | 公開日期: | 31-十月-2001 | 出版社: | 臺北市:國立臺灣大學中國文學系暨研究所 | 摘要: | 明代世情小說《金瓶梅》有三種評本。 在「崇禎本」簡略的批語基礎之上,清人 張竹坡、文龍相繼對該書作了豐富的批 評,其中文龍評點由於發現較晚而猶有許 多值得深入論述的空間。其內容涉及人物 評述、小說技巧、辨析《金瓶梅》情色描 寫以及揭示《金瓶梅》「嫉世病俗」義旨, 由於文龍是直接寫在竹坡的評本之上以作 出回應及批駁,此一「對話者」的立場使 其評點充滿批判色彩,尤其是對書中若干 女性的評價文龍更與竹坡針鋒相對;亦因 在激烈的論辯之中逼顯出對「閱讀」、「批 評」等文學活動的多面思考。讀者的態度、 條件為何?閱讀應該遵循那些規則?由《金 瓶梅》「以淫為戒」的深旨出發,文龍認 為閱讀召喚了讀者的道德意識,期許讀者 為具有高度理性的良知主體,道德意識的 惕勵昂揚即是閱讀的終極關懷。而藉由對 竹坡評點的強烈質疑,文龍評點彰顯了對 讀者主體意識的重視,認為讀者、作者互 為主體而共同建構小說意義,其說不僅承 襲傳統小說評點的特質,亦頗能契合當今 文學理論,因而在小說批評史上應有其值 得肯定之地位。 To date there are three extant critical editions of the Ming dynasty novel Chin-P’ing-Mei. On the basis of the brief comments to be found in the Chung-chen edition, Ch’ing dynasty scholars Chang Chu-po and Wen Long went on to offer extensive critical commentaries. Of these two editions, the Wen Long version was discovered relatively recently and offers a number of points worthy of further consideration, including its critique of characters, discussion of novel-writing techniques, analysis of erotic passages in Chin-P’ing-Mei, and exposition of the cynical undertone of the novel. Since Wen Long wrote his comments directly next to those of Chang Chu-po as a type of response and rebuttal, this “dialogue” format serves to give his comments a highly critical tone, particularly in terms of critiques of some of the female characters in the novel. Likewise, in the course of this heated debate, Wen Long gives serious consideration to the acts of reading and criticism, particularly in terms of what the reader’s attitude is and what rules should apply to reading. Taking his cue from Chin-P’ing-Mei’s theme of using excess as a warning, Wen Long takes the view that the 3 reader is a highly rational, conscientious entity and that reading stimulates his or her moral awareness. On this view, the ultimate goal of reading is to provoke and promote moral awareness. Through his strong questioning of Chang Chu-po’s comments, Wen Long shows the emphasis he gives to the reader’s self-awareness and his belief that the reader and the author are equally important and together construct the novel’s meaning. Wen-Long’s comments not only continue the tradition of the critique of Chinese novel, but also echo modern literary critical theory, and as such make Wen Long deserving of his place in the history of the criticism of the novel. |
URI: | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/4383 | 其他識別: | 892411H002059 | Rights: | 國立臺灣大學中國文學系暨研究所 |
顯示於: | 中國文學系 |
檔案 | 描述 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
892411H002059.pdf | 185.59 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。