https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/35967
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | 吳逸民 | en |
dc.contributor | 臺灣大學:地質科學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | 王天慧 | zh |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Tien-Huei | en |
dc.creator | 王天慧 | zh |
dc.creator | Wang, Tien-Huei | en |
dc.date | 2007 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-26T10:05:38Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-28T12:39:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-26T10:05:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-28T12:39:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier | en-US | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/54849 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 宜蘭雙主震發生於2005年3月5日(東經121.84度, 北緯24.66度), 第一主震深度為10.54公里,在19:06分發震,1.08分鐘後第二主震又在深度6.2公里處發震。兩主震發生時間及位置都十分相近,故一般合稱為雙主震。此雙主震由中研院台灣寬頻地震(BATS)所發布之波形反演地震斷層機制解,兩者均判定為左移之走向滑移斷層,但在氣象局(CWBSN)由P 波初動解出的斷層機制解,第一主震則為東北-西南走向之正斷層。此處震源之爭議點在於其可能的構造意涵而引發學界關注,由於宜蘭平原向來被認知為台灣東部構造連接至沖繩海槽張裂帶的轉換,且為沖繩海槽的向西延伸,目前論述與模型繁多。而清楚底定雙主震之破裂機制,因其特殊位置,正可助於釐清關於構造轉換點的問題,又單就其一主震,有機會進一步探討制定地震斷層機制解在方法上的差異。 本研究中我們針對宜蘭雙主震的第一主震,以兩種方法結果做比較。由於加上在宜蘭平原上密布之台灣強地動網陣列(TSMIP),一方面有更精確的 P波初動解,另一方面可對加速度積分之地表位移做區域性的波形反演測試。據詳細理論方法的推斷,以及配合餘震叢集的結果,我們認為兩種方法呈現不同的地震破裂意涵。P波初動只使用地震波中最初波相所具有的訊息,表現了斷層初始破裂的運動,而波形反演則使用完整波形的訊息,代表了整個破裂過程平均的運動。因此,兩種不同方法所得地震斷層面解有所差異,是印證理論及反應此地震的區域特性的結果。 另外,在區域波形反演方面,我們延用R. B. Herrmann(1985),並由黃柏壽(1994)和張道明(2005)修改之波數積分法產生合成波形。首先以平原上23個測站單站波形擬合,發現單站無法配合此區域側向上速度模型的不確定性,使得反演結果並不穩定,因而改以15個測站共同反演,並且引用吳逸民(2007)最新台灣區域的地震層析成像結果,截取宜蘭地區平均的一維速度模型,並加上宜蘭平原下低速層的區域構造。多站反演結果顯示,共同反演確實可以得到較為可信的斷層機制解。即使降低了各站波形的擬合度,多站反演出的單一解其穩定性、及與餘震之斷層機制解對比,仍表現出較合理的特性。根據本研究的結果,此一主震應為帶有正斷層分量之左移走向斷層。由這個證據應可推估,張裂與走向滑移的轉換點,最可能發生在宜蘭平原此一位置。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | On 5 March 2005, an earthquake pair occurred at Ilan (121.84°E, 24.66°N), northeastern Taiwan. Both mainshocks have similar magnitude (ML = 5.9 and ML = 6.0). The first one was determined as a normal solution based on first-motion polarities of P wave from Central Weather Bureau Seismic Network (CWBSN) and Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (TSMIP), while it was solved as a strike-slip solution by Broadband Array in Taiwan for Seismology (BATS) Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) inversion. Normal faulting would be consistent with the opening and extension of Okinawa Trough on tectonic basis. On the other hand, a strike-slip solution would provide us one possible answer to the slip accommodation of compression. Thus, obtaining one reliable solution to this focal mechanism has become one important issue. To resolve the focal mechanism mentioned above, we target the first mainshock for its solution inconsistency in two methods. Firstly we applied Moment Tensor Inversions using much denser TSMIP strong motion array in Ilan region. The kernel computer code was adopted from R. B. Herrmann (1985) and later modified by Huang (1994) and Chang (2005). Synthetic waveform is generated with wavenumber integration method to simulate the three-component time history from hypothesized point source. Results from 23 stations using single station approach suggest that lateral variance of velocity structures underneath Ilan plain are dramatic. Multi-station inversion helped us to model this event at threshold magnitude(ML = 5.9) as point source. It serves to cancel out velocity variances from each station. We further applied multi-station approach to conceal velocity variation along different paths. The inversion result from fifteen stations provided a more convincing, averaged slip solution. This event was an oblique event in between normal component and strike-slip. The first motion solution simply presents initial rupture motion of an event, which could be irrelevant to subsequent slip motion of the whole cluster. By our result, we can conclude the initial rupture motion to be normal, and later strike-slip motion dominated the rest of this event. The multi-station approach is applicable for near-field TSMIP records to obtain reliable CMT solutions. | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgement iii Abstract v 中文摘要 vi List of Figures viii List of Tables ix 1. Introduction i 1.1 Motivation and Goal 1 1.2 Study Strategy and Overview 6 1.3 Local Geological Background 7 1.4 Previous Studies, Comments and Debates 11 1.4.1 Seismic Reflection 11 1.4.2 Seismotectonic studies from first motion focal mechanism 12 1.4.3 Inversion Centroid Moment Tensors 15 2. Method and Theory 18 2.1 First Motion Focal Mechanism Determination 18 2.2 Moment Tensor Solution --Theory 19 2.2.1 Hypothesis 19 2.2.2 Green’s Function and Synthetic 22 2.2.3 Inversion 24 2.3 Synthetic Seismogram Computation 27 2.3.1 Wave Integration 27 2.3.2 Source Time Function 27 2.3.3 Phase 28 2.4 Wave Integration and Correction 29 2.5 Single Station Approach 29 2.6 Multi-station Approach 30 3. Data and Material 32 3.1 Central Weather Bureau Seismic Network (CWBSN) Earthquake Catalogue 32 3.2 Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (TSMIP) Strong Motion Station 33 3.3 One Dimension Velocity Model 37 3.4 Waveform Data 41 3.5 Synthetic Seismogram Computation 42 4. Results 43 4.1 First Motion Solution and Local Aftershocks 43 4.2 Moment Tensor Solution—Single Station Result 45 4.3 Moment Tensor Solution—Multi-Station Result 47 5. Discussions 52 5.1 Single Station Inversion 52 5.1.1 Tradeoff Problem 52 5.1.2 Sensibility to Velocity Model 54 5.1.3 Solution to Single Station Problem 55 5.2 Multi-Station Inversion 56 5.2.1 Depth Test 57 5.2.2 Comparison with BATS 60 5.2.2.1 Focal Depth 60 5.2.2.2 Station Coverage 60 5.2.2.3 Velocity Model and Frequency Range 61 5.3 Local Clustered Aftershocks 65 5.4 Physical Interpretation for First Motion and Waveform Inversion 68 5.5 Local Earthquake Characteristics 70 6. Conclusions 72 7. REFERENCES…………………………………………..73 8. APPENDIX..……………………………………….…....78 I. CPS 3.3.0 application flow chart II. TSMIP site and instrument classification III. Bilingual words and Terminology LIST OF FIGURES 1 First motion solution for the first mainshock…………………………………2 2 First motion solutions for the second mainshock…………………………...2 3 BATS CMT solution for two maihshocks…………………………………….4 4 Station distribution of BATS and TSMIP array for two mainshocks……….5 5 Flow chart of study procedure………………………………………………..7 6 Geological Map of Ilan region………………………………………………...9 7 Basement subsurface contour map with Active fault.…………………….10 8 Fault system from seismic reflection………………………………………..11 9 Shallow Seismicity and Earthquake clusters for Ilan region……………..13 10 First motion focal mechanisms for Ilan region……………………………..14 11 Shape of source time function...…………………………………………….28 12 TSMIP stations with classifications of site……………………………...….34 13 TSMIP instrument response…………………………………………………36 14 TSMIP stations used in our study…………………………………………..37 15 Selected Tomography grids in Ilan region………………………………….39 16 Acceleration waveform from station ILA042……………………………….42 17 First motion result of five Aftershocks………………………………………44 18 Single station approach result………………………………………………45 19 Station distribution for multi-station approach……………………………..48 20 Multi-station approach result…...…………………………………………...49 21 Multi-station approach waveform fit (I)……………………………………..50 Multi-station approach waveform fit (II)…………………………………….51 22 Schematic example of inversion trade-off………………………………....53 23 Misfit and CLVD curve for the depth test……….……………….………....58 24 Solution variations for the depth test …………………………..…………..59 25 Station coverage comparison…………………...…………………………..61 26 Velocity models comparison(0~50 km depth)……………………………..62 27 Velocity models comparison(0~20 km depth)……………………………..63 28 Two tomography profiles…………………………………………………….64 29 Aftershock distribution and simulated fault plane…………………………66 30 Five Aftershock distribution and pattern……………………………………68 31 Eight examples of local earthquake pattern..……………………………...71 LIST OF TABLES Table.1 Averaged tomographic velocity model for Ilan region 39 Table.2 Modified one-dimension velocity model. 40 Table.3 Parameters for single stations and inversed results.............46 Table.4 The Focal depth test results and parameters………………..59 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 7480787 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language | en-US | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.subject | 宜蘭雙主震 | en |
dc.subject | 波形反演 | en |
dc.subject | 地震斷層機制解 | en |
dc.subject | P 波初動解 | en |
dc.subject | 波數積分法 | en |
dc.subject | 台灣強地動網陣列 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 地震層析成像 | en |
dc.subject | 多站反演 | en |
dc.subject | Ilan plain | en |
dc.subject | earthquake pair | en |
dc.subject | TSMIP | en |
dc.subject | Moment Tensor Inversion | en |
dc.subject | wavenumber integration | en |
dc.subject | Multi-station inversion | en |
dc.subject | first motion solution | en |
dc.subject | CMT | en |
dc.title | 2005年宜蘭雙主震之震源機制解: 應用近場波形反演法探討區域地震機制 | en |
dc.title | The Ilan Earthquake Pair on 5 March 2005: Discussion on Focal Mechanism Determination with Near-field Waveform Inversion | en |
dc.type | thesis | en |
dc.identifier.uri.fulltext | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/54849/1/ntu-96-R94224203-1.pdf | - |
dc.relation.reference | Alekseev, A. S. and B. G. Mikhailenkl, (1980) The solution of dynamic problems of elastic wave propagation in inhomogeneous media by a combination of partial separation of variables and finite difference models, Geophysical Journal, 48, 161-172. Angelier, J., T. Y. Chang, J. C. Hu, C. P. Chang, L., Siame, J. C. Lee, B. Deffontaines, T. H. Chu and C. Y. Lu ,(2007) Does extrusion occurs at both tips of the Taiwan collision belt ? Insights from active deformation studies in the Ilan Plain and Pingtung Plain regions. Tectonophysics, in revision. Aki, K., P. G. Richards (1980). Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, 1st ed., 932 pp. Bouchon M., 1981. A simple method to calculate greens functions for elastic layered media. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 71(4), 959-971. Chen, Y. L. (1995), Three-dimensional velocity structure and kinematic analysis in the Taiwan area. Master Thesis, National Central University. (In Chinese) Chang, C. H.(2004) Applications of a Dense Seismic Network Data on the Study of Seismogenic Structures of Central and Eastern Taiwan. Doctoral Dissertation, National Central University. (In Chinese) Chiang, S. C. (1976) Seismic study in the Ilan Plain, Mining Tech., 14(6), 215-221. (In Chinese) Chou, H. C., Kuo, B. Y., Hung, S. H., Chiao, L. Y., Zhao, D. and Wu, Y. M.(2006) The Taiwan-Ryukyu subduction-collision complex: Folding of a viscoelastic slab and the double seismic zone. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 111, B04410, doi:10.1029/2005JB003822 Douglas, H. C. and Larry, J. R. (1985) Analysis of the Trade-off between Hypocentral Depth and Source Time Function. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 75(6), 1637-1656. Font Y. and Shine L. C.,(2001) Models of the Ongoing Arc-continent Collisional Processes in Taiwan New Insights from Seismic Reflection Analyses and Earthquake Relocation. Doctoral Dissertation, National Taiwan University, Institude of Oceanography. Gilbert, F. and D. V. Helmberger, (1972) Generalized ray theory for a layered sphere, Geophysical Journal., 27, 57-80. Haskell, N. A. (1964) Total Energy and Energy Spectral Density of Elastic Wave Radiation from Propagating Faults. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 54(6A), 1811-1841. Helmberger, D. V. (1974) Generalized ray theory for shear dislocation. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 64(1), 45-64. Helmberger, D. V. (1974) Generalized ray theory for shear dislocation. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 64(1), 45-64. Herrmann, R. B., (1979) SH-wave generation by dislocation source – A numerical study. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 69(1), 1-15. Herrmann, R. B. (2002). Computer Programs in Seismology, An overview of Synthetic Seismogram Computation.Version 3.3.0, Appendix I. http://www.iasbs.ac.ir/faculty/hamid/askari/herrmann/ Herrmann, R. B. and Wang, C. Y. (1985): A comparison of synthetic seismograms. Bulletin of Seismology. Society America, 75, 41-56. Ho, C. S. (1988), An Introduction to the Geology of Taiwan, Explanatory Text of the Geologic Map of Taiwan, 2nd ed., 192 pp., Cent. Geol. Surv., Taipei. Huang, B. S. (1994) Estimation of Source Parameters by the Inversion of Near Source Strong Motion Wave Forms. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 1, 11-26. Huang, H. S. (2006) The Shallow seismicity in Ilan Region and its Tectonic Implication. Poster on Annual Meeting of Geological Society, 2006. Jost, M. L. and Herrmann, R. B.,(1989): A Student’s Guide to and Review of Moment Tensors. Seismological Research Letters, 60, 37-35. Kao, H., S. J. Shen, and K. F. Ma, (1998b) Transition from oblique subduction to collision: Earthquakes in the southernmost Ryukyu arc-Taiwan region. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 7211-7229. Kao, H. and Jian, P. R.(1999). Source Parameters of Regional Earthquakes in Taiwan: July 1995-December 1996. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 3, 585-604. Kao, H., Y. H. Liu, W. T. Liang and W. P. Chen (2002). Source Parameters of Regional Earthquakes in Taiwan: 1999-2000 Including the Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake Sequence. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 3, 279-298. Langstan, C. A. and D. V. Helmberger, (1975) A procedure for modeling shallow dislocation sources, Geophysical Journal ,42, 117-130. Liang, W. T., J. C. Lee and B. Y. Kuo (2005). Left-lateral strike-slip faulting in Ilan: Lateral extrusion at the transition between Taiwan mountain range and Okinawa Trough. Geodynamics and Environment in East Asia International Conference & 5th Taiwan-France Earth Science Symposium, 104-108. Liu, K. S., Shin, T. C. and Tsia, Y. B. (1999) A Free-Field Strong Motion Network in Taiwan: TSMIP. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 2, 377-396. Lee, C. T., C. T. Cheng, C. W. Liaw, and Y.-B. Chang (1998), Active fault map of Taiwan, Graduate Institute of Applied Geology, Engineering Geology and Advance Technology Lab, Chungli, Taiwan. Lee, C. Y., Cheng, C. T., Liao, C. W. and Tzai, Y. B. (2001) Site Classification of Taiwan Free-Field Strong-Motion Stations. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 91(5), 1283-1297. Menke, W. (1989) Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory, revised ed., Int. Geophys. Series, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 119-124 pp. Olson A. H. and R. J. Apsel, (1982) Finite faults and inverse theory with applications to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 72(6A), 1969-2001. Rau, R. J. and Wu, F. T. (1995). Tomographic imaging of lithospheric structures under Taiwan. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 133, 517-532. Satake, K. (1985) Effects of Station Coverage on Moment Tensor Inversion. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 75(6), 1657-1667. Shyu, J. Bruce H, Kerry Sieh, and Chen, Y. G. (2005), Neotectonic architecture of Taiwan and its implications for future large earthquakes. Journal of Geophys. Res., V. 110, B08402, doi:10.1029/2004JB003251 Silver, P. G.. and Jordan, T. H.(1982) Optimal Estimation of Scalar Seismic Moment. The Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 70, 755-787. Tan, Y., Zhu, L., Helmberger, D. V. and Saikai, C. K. (2006) Locating and modeling regional earthquakes with two stations. Journal of Geophys. Res., V. 111, B01306 doi:10.1029/2005JB003775. Tsai, Y. B., Teng, T., Chiu, J. M. and Liu, H. L. (1977) Tectonic Implications of the Seismicity in the Taiwan region. Mem. of the Geology Soc. China, 2, 13-41. Tsao, C. W. (2006) Slip distributions of 2005 earthquake doublet beneath I-Lan plain, Taiwan. Master Thesis, National Central University. Wang, C. (1982) Earthquakes caused by horizontal bending of the Philippine Sea plate near Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 88, T1-T6. Wang, C. Y. and Herrmann, R. B. (1980). A numerical study of P-, SV-, and SH-wave generation in a plane layered medium, Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 70, 1015-1036. Wu, Y. M., C.C. Chen, T.C. Shin, Y.B. Tsai, W.H.K. Lee, and T. L. Teng (1997). Taiwan Rapid Earthquake Information Release System, Seismological Research Letter, 68, 931-943. Wu, Y. M., T. C. Shin, and Y. B. Tsai (1998). Quick and reliable determination of magnitude for seismic early warning, Bulletin of Seismology Society America, 88(5), 1254-1259. Wu, Y. M., J. K. Chung, T. C. Shin, N. C. Hsiao, Y. B. Tsai, W. H. K. Lee, and T. L. Teng (1999). Development of an integrated seismic early warning system in Taiwan- case for Hualien earthquakes. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 10, 719-736. Wu, Y. M., Zhao, L. and Chang, C. H. (2007) Focal mechanism determination in Taiwan by genetic algorithm. Bulletin of Seismology Society America, in revision. Wu, F. T. (1978) Recent tectonics of Taiwan. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 26(suppl.), S265-S299. Wu, Y. M., C. H. Chang, L. Zhao, J Bruce H. Shyu, Y. G. Chen, K. Sieh, and J. P. Avouac (2007). Seismic tomography and earthquake relocation in Taiwan using S-P times from a dense network of strong-motion stations. Journal of Geophys. Res., submitted. Wu, Y. M., N. C. Hsiao, W. H. K. Lee, T. L. Teng, and T. C. Shin (2007). State of the art and progresses of early warning system in Taiwan, in ‘Seismic Early Warning’ edit by Paolo Gasparini, Gaetano Manfredi, and Jochen Zschau, Springer in press. Yadav, D. K. and Ma, K. F.(2004) Fault Segmentation and Stress Pattern in North-East Taiwan (Ilan). 2004 Joint Geosciences Assembly(JGA), abstract. | en |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
item.openairetype | thesis | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | with fulltext | - |
顯示於: | 地質科學系 |
檔案 | 描述 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-R94224203-1.pdf | 23.53 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
在 IR 系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。