https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/540955
Title: | Asian consensus statements on endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis Part 1: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment | Authors: | Isayama H. Nakai Y. Rerknimitr R. Khor C. Lau J. HSIU-PO WANG Seo D.W. Ratanachu-ek T. Lakhtakia S. Ang T.L. Ryozawa S. Hayashi T. Kawakami H. Yamamoto N. Iwashita T. Itokawa F. Kuwatani M. Kitano M. Hanada K. Kogure H. Hamada T. Ponnudurai R. Moon J.H. Itoi T. Yasuda I. Irisawa A. Maetani I. |
Keywords: | acute necrotizing pancreatitis; endoscopic necrosectomy; endoscopy; endosonography; walled-off necrosis | Issue Date: | 2016 | Publisher: | Blackwell Publishing | Journal Volume: | 31 | Journal Issue: | 9 | Start page/Pages: | 1546-1554 | Source: | Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia) | Abstract: | Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a relatively new term for encapsulated necrotic tissue after severe acute pancreatitis. Various terminologies such as pseudocyst, necroma, pancreatic abscess, and infected necrosis were previously used in the literature, resulting in confusion. The current and past terminologies must be reconciled to meaningfully interpret past data. Recently, endoscopic necrosectomy was introduced as a treatment option and is now preferred over surgical necrosectomy when the expertise is available. However, high-quality evidence is still lacking, and there is no standard management strategy for WON. The consensus meeting aimed to clarify the diagnostic criteria for WON and the role of endoscopic interventions in its management. In the Consensus Conference, 27 experts from eight Asian countries took an active role and examined key clinical aspects of WON diagnosis and endoscopic management. Statements were crafted based on literature review and expert opinion, employing the modified Delphi method. All statements were substantiated by the level of evidence and the strength of the recommendation. We created 27 consensus statements for WON diagnosis and management, including details of endoscopic procedures. When there was not enough solid evidence to support the statements, this was clearly acknowledged to facilitate future research. Proposed management strategies were formulated and are illustrated using flow charts. These recommendations, which are based on the best current scientific evidence and expert opinion, will be useful for guiding endoscopic management of WON. Part 1 of this statement focused on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and timing of intervention. ? 2016 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
URI: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84988624817&doi=10.1111%2fjgh.13394&partnerID=40&md5=d244c7b3e66a61311fefca9f150134bd https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/540955 |
ISSN: | 0815-9319 | DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.13394 | SDG/Keyword: | antibiotic agent; histamine H2 receptor antagonist; octreotide; proteinase inhibitor; somatostatin; acute pancreatitis; Asian; computer assisted tomography; consensus development; disease predisposition; evidence based medicine; human; incidence; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; practice guideline; priority journal; Review; surgical drainage; tissue necrosis; treatment indication; walled off necrosis; acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis; consensus development; Delphi study; digestive tract endoscopy; endoscopic ultrasonography; pancreatectomy; procedures; x-ray computed tomography; Delphi Technique; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Endosonography; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Incidence; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing; Tomography, X-Ray Computed [SDGs]SDG3 |
Appears in Collections: | 醫學系 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.