Optimizing antifungal dosing for invasive infections: minimum inhibitory concentration distributions and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic insights from 2010-2023 Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance data.
Journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Journal Volume
16
Start Page
Article Number : 1665253
ISSN
1663-9812
Date Issued
2025
Author(s)
Liu, Chia-Ying
Lai, Chih-Cheng
Hsueh, Chun-Chung
Weng, Chih-Jen
Chang, Wei-Lun
Jean, Shio-Shin
Abstract
Objective: The 2024 global cryptococcosis treatment guidelines suggests that fluconazole (FLC) combined with liposomal amphotericin B (AMB) and 5-flucytosine (5-FC) as the mainstay of treatment for systemic cryptococcosis. Although this 2024 guidelines also list recommend voriconazole (VRC), posaconazole (POS), and isavuconazole (ISA) as alternatives to FLC during the consolidation and maintenance phases, current data on distributions of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of global Cryptococcus isolates for antifungals—and studies evaluating the application of their pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and pharmacodynamic (PD) indices in the treatment of systemic cryptococcosis—remain limited. To optimize antifungal dosing, integration of global MIC distributions for Cryptococcus isolates with PK/PD parameters for key antifungal agents is needed. Methods: This study analyzed the MIC distributions from the 2010–2023 antifungal Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance database, and determined epidemiological cutoff values for major Cryptococcus species. Results: The majority of invasive Cryptococcus isolates were classified as wild-type strains (>90%). We analyzed PK profiles (particularly central nervous system [CNS] penetration from the bloodstream), PD indices of antifungals (azoles and AMB) against yeasts. Based on 25 studies clearly describing PK–PD relationships, FLC and VRC were considered optimal choices because of superior CNS penetration. The optimal dose of FLC is 800–1,200 mg/day, whereas dosages of VRC and ISA do not require adjustment. Nevertheless, therapeutic drug monitoring for VRC is warranted during its prescription due to significant variability in plasma concentrations influenced by multiple factors. POS is not suitable for induction therapy in systemic cryptococcosis. Additionally, ISA is preferred over POS for consolidation therapy for Cryptococcus meningitis/meningoencephalitis (MME) based on differences in their PK profiles. Furthermore, a single 10 mg/kg dose of liposomal AMB—a cost-effective strategy—should be combined with 1,200 mg/day FLC and 5-FC, or alternatively VRC, as an effective induction-phase regimen for treating Cryptococcus MME. Conclusion: Diverging from the 2024 guidelines, this study provides novel insights into the treatment of Cryptococcus MME based on MIC distributions and PK-PD indices for antifungal agents.
Subjects
Cryptococcus species
fluconazole
isavuconazole
liposomal amphotericin B
posaconazole
voriconazole
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Type
journal article