Publication: Seismic Behavior of Bolted Connections and Energy-Dissipated Connections for Concrete-Filled Steel Columns and H-Beams
dc.contributor | 吳賴雲 | en |
dc.contributor.author | Tsai, Sheng-Fu | en |
dc.creator | Tsai, Sheng-Fu | en |
dc.date | 2006 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-11-25T18:57:33Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-09T18:23:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-11-25T18:57:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-09T18:23:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.description.abstract | The structural system of steel beams and Concrete-Filled Tubular (CFT) columns has the characteristics of high strength, ductility, load bearing capacity and fast construction. However, the behavior of beam-to-column connections is so complicated that it is not widely applied in practice. For the beam-to-column connection of this structural system, this study developed two detailed design methods, which are bolted connection and pre-stressed energy-dissipated connection. This study first established a series of mechanics theoretical models for these beam-to-column connections. Then a series of structural seismic-resistant tests was performed to verify the seismic resistance of these connections. The first topic of the study is “Seismic Behavior of Bolted Connections for CFT Columns and H-Beams”. Traditional beam-to-column connection was fully penetrating welded by backing bars on jobsites. This connection method usually produces voids between backing bar and column flange. When beam end is loaded, the voids will result in stress concentration, grow into column plate and tear the welding zone apart. Because of the weakness of welding zone, the beam-to-column connection failed before the strength and ductility of beam, column and panel zone were fully developed. In this paper, a new design of bolted beam-to-column connections for CFT is proposed. A mechanical model is established and a series of cyclic loading experiments have been conducted to verify it. The experimental results and theoretical results are very close, which demonstrates that the bolted connections have superior seismic resistance in stiffness, strength, ductility and energy dissipation mechanism. The second topic of the study is “Earthquake-resistant Behavior for Connections of Pre-stressed Steel Beams and CFT Columns with X-shaped Dampers”. The bolted beam-to-column connection design mentioned above have full hysteretic loops and advantages as high stiffness, strength, and good energy dissipation ability, but the moment-resistant structure will have residual displacement after an earthquake. Therefore, Pre-stressed structural system and energy-dissipated element concept were applied in the study. This study proposed a detail design which used X-shaped dampers as energy dissipation elements for pre-stressed steel beam and CFT column connection. The structural system is expected to retain self-centering ability after an earthquake since the X-shaped dampers are energy dissipation elements that can protect the major structural elements from damage. This study established mechanics models for this beam-to-column connection. A series of tests was performed to prove the seismic behavior of the connection. The experimental results showed that the beam-to-column connection not only can absorb most seismic energy through the X-shaped dampers, but also can be repaired fast and easily after earthquake. Besides, this study verified that the proposed beam-to-column connection has superior stiffness, strength, ductility, energy dissipation and self-centering ability. For the two design methods, the theoretical equations derived from beam-to-column connection mechanics model established in this study was proven realistic by experiments, so the equations and experimental results proposed in this study are worth referencing. | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | PART I Seismic Behavior of Bolted Connections for CFT Columns and H-Beams Abstract 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Mechanical Model for Panel Zone of Bolted Connections 7 2.1 Steel Tube 7 2.2 Concrete 15 2.3 Steel Tube and Concrete 19 3. Experimental Design 21 3.1 Design of Testing Frame 21 3.2 Design of Specimens 22 3.3 The Loading System 25 3.4 Displacement Measurement 26 3.4.1 Displacement contributed by panel zone 27 3.4.2 Displacement contributed by column 28 3.4.3 Displacement contributed by beam 29 4. Experimental Results and Discussion 31 4.1 Experiment Courses and Failure Modes 31 4.1.1 Experimental results with specimen FSB6 31 4.1.2 Experimental results with specimen FSB8 32 4.1.3 Experimental results with specimen FSB10 33 4.1.4 Experimental results with specimen FSBE6 34 4.1.5 Experimental results with specimen FSBE8 35 4.1.6 Experimental results with specimen FSBE10 35 4.1.7 Discussion 36 4.2 Discussions on strength, ductility and energy dissipation 36 4.3 Angular displacements and energy dissipations of beam, column and panel zone 38 4.4 Relationships between forces and deformations of the panel zone 39 5. Conclusions 41 References 43 Tables 45 Figures 49 Photos 73 Appendix 77 PART II Earthquake-resistant Behavior for Connections of Pre-stressed Steel Beams and CFT Columns with X-shaped Dampers Abstract 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Mechanics Behavior of Beam-to-column Connection 7 2.1 Stiffness of Beam-to-column Connection 7 2.2 Total Stiffness of Beam-to-column Connection 16 3. Experimental Design 19 3.1 Specimen Design 19 3.2 Loading System 21 3.3 Displacement Measurement 21 3.3.1 Displacement contributed by panel zone 22 3.3.2 Deformation contributed by beam-to-column interface opening 23 3.3.3 Displacement contributed by column 24 3.3.4 Displacement contributed by beam 25 4. Experimental Results and Discussion 27 4.1 Overall Behavior and Self-centering Ability 27 4.2 Deformation of each Component and Energy Dissipation 27 4.3 Pre-stress Loss of Strands 28 4.4 Strength and Stiffness 28 4.5 Discussion of the size for the X-shaped damper 29 5. Conclusions and Future Research 31 5.1 Conclusions 31 5.2 Future Research 32 References 33 Tables 35 Figures 39 Photos 59 Appendix 65 | en |
dc.format.extent | 1971146 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier | en-US | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/50280 | |
dc.identifier.uri.fulltext | http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/50280/1/ntu-95-D89521003-1.pdf | |
dc.language | en-US | en |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation.reference | PART I Seismic Behavior of Bolted Connections for CFT Columns and H-Beams [1] Fujimoto, T., Nishiyama, I., Mukai, A., Test results of CFT beam-to-column connection. U.S.-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program: Composite and Hybrid Structures, 4th JTCC, Oct.12-14, 1997. [2] Lin, K. C., Tsai, K. C., “Steel beam to CFT column connections using external clamping disaphragms”, The First International Conference on Structural Stability and Dynamics, Taipei, Taiwan, pp.593-598, 2000. [3] Azizinamini, A., Prakash, B., “A tentative design guideline for a new steel beam connection detail to composite tube columns”, Engineering Journal, AISC, 3rd Quarter, pp.108-15, 1993. [4] Ricles, J. M., Lu, L. M., Graham, W. W., Vermaas, G. W., “Seismic performance of CFT column-WF beam rigid connections”, U.S.-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program: Composite and Hybrid Structures, 4th JTCC, 1997. [5] Ricles, J. M., Lu, L. M., Sooi, T. K., Vermaas, G. W., Graham, W. W., “Experimental performance of moment connections in CFT column-WF beam structural systems under seismic loading”, Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 1224, 1996. [6] Youssef, N. F. G., Bonowitz, D., Gross, J. L., “A survey of steel moment-resisting frame buildings affected by the 1994 Northridge Earthquake”, Report No. NISTIR 5625, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md., 1995. [7] Popov, E. P., Yang, T. S., Chang, S. P. “Design of MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge Earthquake. Engineering Structure, 20, pp.1030-1038, 1998. [8] Azizinamini, A., Shekar, Y., “Design of through beam connection detail for circular composite columns”, Engineering Structures, Vol.17, pp.209-231, 1995. [9] Fujimoto, T., Inai, E., Tokinoya, H., Kai, M., Mori, K., Mori, O., Nishiyama, I., “Behavior of beam-to-column connection of CFT Column system under seismic force”, Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Steel-Concrete Composite Structure, Los Angeles, California. [10] Kang, C. H., Shin, K. J., Oh, Y. S., Moon, T. S., “Hysteresis behavior of CFT column to H-beam connections with external T-stiffeners and penetrated elements”, Engineering Structure, 23(9), pp.1194-1201, 2001. [11] Elremaily, A., Azizinamini, A., “Design provision for connections between steel beam and concrete filled tube column”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol.57, pp.971-795, 2001. [12] Shin, K. J., Kim, Y. J., Oh, Y. S., Moon, T. S., “Behavior of welded CFT column to H-beam connections with external stiffeners”, Engineering Structure, 26(11), pp.1877-1887, 2004. [13] Alostaz, Y. M., Schneider, S. P., “Analytical behavior of connections to concrete-filled steel tubes”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 40, pp.95-127, 1996. [14] Alostaz, Y. M., and Schneider, S. P., “Connections to concrete-filled steel tubes”, Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, June 23-28, Paper No.748, 1996. [15] Schneider, S. P., “Summary of connections to concrete-filled steel tube columns”, 4th Joint Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting, US-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program on Composite and Hybrid Structures, Monterey, California, U.S.A., Oct. 12-14, 1997. [16] Furlong, R. W., “Design of steel-encased concrete beam-columns”, Journal of Structural Division”, ASCE, 94(ST1), pp.267-281, 1968. [17] Krawinkler, H., “Shear in beam-column joints in seismic design of steel frames”, Engineering Journal, AISC, Vol.15, No.2, pp.82-91, 1978. [18] Richart, F. E. et. al., “A Study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses”, Univ. of Illinois Eng. Expert. Stat. Bulletin, 185, 1928. PART II Earthquake-resistant Behavior for Connections of Pre-stressed Steel Beams and CFT Columns with X-shaped Dampers [1] Priestley, M. J. N. and Tao, J. R., “Seismic Response of Precast Prestressed Concrete Frames Partially Debonded Tendons”, PCI Journal, January-February, pp.58-66-2, 1993. [2] Ricles, J. M., Sause, R., Garlock, M. M. and Zhao, C., “Posttensioned Seismic-Resistant Connections for Steel Frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.127, No.2, February, pp.113-121, 2001. [3] Ricles, J. M., Sause, R., Peng S.W. and Lu L. W., “Experimental Evalution of Earthqake Resistant Posttensioned Steel Connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.128, No.7, July, pp.850-859, 2002. [4] Christopous, C., Filiatrault, A., Uang, C. M., and Folz, B., “Posttension Energy Dissipating Connections for Moment-Resisting Steel Frames”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.128, No.9, September, pp.1111-1120, Sep, 2002. [5] Christopous, C., Filiatrault, A., and Folz, B., “Seismic Response of Self-Centering Hysteretic SDOF Systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.31, pp.1131-1150, 2003. [6] Garlock, M. M., Ricles J. M. and Sause R., “Cyclic Properties and Analysis of Bolted Top-and-Seat Angle Connections”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.129, No.12, December, pp.1615-1625, 2003. [7] Pampanim, S., Christopous, C., and Priestley, M. J., “Performance-Based Seismic Response of Frame Structures Including Residual Deformations.Part II: Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol.7, No.1, pp.119-147, 2003. [8] Rojas, P., Ricles, J. M. and Sause, R., “Seismic Performance of Post-tensioned Steel Moment Resisting Frames With Friction Devices”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.131, No.4, April, pp.529-540, 2005. | en |
dc.subject | 鋼管混凝土 | en |
dc.subject | 螺栓式梁柱接頭 | en |
dc.subject | 預力結構 | en |
dc.subject | 消能接頭 | en |
dc.subject | X字型消能器 | en |
dc.subject | concrete filled tube (CFT) | en |
dc.subject | bolted beam-to-column connection | en |
dc.subject | pre-stressed structure | en |
dc.subject | energy-dissipated connection | en |
dc.subject | X-shaped damper | en |
dc.title | Seismic Behavior of Bolted Connections and Energy-Dissipated Connections for Concrete-Filled Steel Columns and H-Beams | en |
dc.type | thesis | en |
dspace.entity.type | Publication |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1