Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Law / 法律學院
  3. Law / 法律學系
  4. A Study on the Prisoner Rights Litigation
 
  • Details

A Study on the Prisoner Rights Litigation

Date Issued
2011
Date
2011
Author(s)
Wu, Chia-Lin
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/249595
Abstract
The Prison Act in the Repbublic of China (R.O.C) was enacted in 1945. Although the Prison Act has amended several times, it doesn’t allow prisoners in the R.O.C the right of access to the court until now. The Judicial sytem in R.O.C refused to review prisoner complaints regarding conditions of confinement as well. The United States passed The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) in 1996, which amends and supplements the U.S. Code in a number of ways in order to restrict and discourage litigation by prisoners. This article introduces the prospective relief provisions, the exhaustion of administrative remedies provisions, the three strikes provisions, the emotional injuries provisions, and the in forma pauperis provisions. However, as we don’t share the same historical backgrounds (the inmate litigation explosion) with the United States, the provisions mentioned above may not be the answer to our legal system. On the other hand, in order to facilitate the rehabilitation and resocialization of inmates, with due regard to their humanity, Japan began their reforms of the penal systems. The Act on Penal Institutions and the Treatment of Sentenced Inmates which focuses on the treatment of sentenced inmates was approved at the Ordinary Session of the Diet in 2005, and the Act for Partial Revision of the Act on Penal Institutions and the Treatment of Sentenced Inmates which stipulates the treatment of unsentenced inmates was approved at the Ordinary Session of the Diet in 2006. The enforcement of the Act changed the title from “the Act on Penal Institutions and the Treatment of Sentenced Inmates” to “the Act on Penal and Detention Facilities and the Treatment of Inmates”. The Prison Law in Japan then had been totally revised for the first time in nearly 100 years. To sum up, while prisoner rights may be restricted by the facility and particular state of incarceration, prisoners do not lose their constitutional rights when they are incarcerated. The reform of our Prison Law should be done right away.
Subjects
prisoners’ rights
prison conditions
the hands-off doctrine
the Prison Litigation Reform Act
the Act on Penal Institutions and the Treatment of Sentenced Inmates
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-100-R96a21016-1.pdf

Size

23.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):5287321ffca03e6287a4c0cd7ce81fb6

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science