Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. Political Science / 政治學系
  4. Locke on the Limits on Private Property Accumulation by Natural Law: Second Treatise Revisited
 
  • Details

Locke on the Limits on Private Property Accumulation by Natural Law: Second Treatise Revisited

Date Issued
2016
Date
2016
Author(s)
Cheng, Yang-Yang
DOI
10.6342/NTU201602636
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/273789
Abstract
In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke asserts that natural law sets limits on private property accumulation, including that men must labour, obtain others’ consent, leave “enough and as good” for others, and must not let the resource spoil when accumulating private property. However, interpreters have debated on the role and validity of natural law after people enter political society. This thesis maintains that these limits by natural law do not dissolve after the invention of money and people’s entrance into political society from the state of nature. As a matter of fact, natural law persists in binding people in political society, and the government is obligated to make laws in accordance with natural law and ensure the limits continue to be executed. This thesis further argues that in the Second Treatise, the “property” the government is to preserve refers to “Property” in the broader sense, that is, Life, Liberty and Possessions; among others, Liberty as non-domination is the core, as it is this Liberty that lays the foundation of preserving life and possessions. By examining and criticising the interpretations made by James Tully, Jeremy Waldron and A. John Simmons, especially how they apprehend the Labour Limit, Consent Limit and Sufficiency Limit, i.e. the three limits on private property accumulation set by natural law, the thesis demonstrates and distinguishes an alternative interpretation: the end of government is to preserve everyone’s Liberty as non-domination. In view that the property government is to preserve refers not to the possessions acquired in the state of nature, but to Liberty as non-domination, government’s (non-arbitrary) interference in possessions through law can be justified, and accordingly, government’s redistribution of private property does not contradict its end to “preserve property”.
Subjects
Locke
Natural Law
Private Property
Liberty as Non-Domination
Labour
Consent
Sufficiency (Enough and as good) Limit
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-105-R02322020-1.pdf

Size

23.54 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):bdcea6678e54621bf8c4e980f6e13d26

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science