The Methodological Reflection about the Criticism to Hu Hong in The Doubt of Zhi Yan by Zhu Hsi
Resource
國立臺灣大學哲學論評, 37, 121-162
Journal
國立臺灣大學哲學論評
Journal Issue
37
Pages
121-162
Date Issued
2009-03
Date
2009-03
Author(s)
杜保瑞
Abstract
The discussion in this article is about the criticism to Hu Hong in The doubt of Zhi yan Proposed by Zhu Hsi. The author is aiming to clear the dissimilar way of thinking between the two philosophers to the effect that both their significant theory could be appeared. Hu Hong’s philosophical announcement always integrates the ontological and practical theory, which results to the ambiguity and give rise to the criticism from Zhu Hsi. Zhu Hsi possessed the position of the goodness of nature to query Hu Hong about his no good and no evil opinion toward the theory of the human nature. In the definition of the mind and nature, master Zhu Hsi proposed the mind comprise the nature and the felling and argued with Hu Hong’s different opining. Concerning about the practical procedure theory, Zhu Hsi insist the cultivation should be built on daily life, and critic Hu Hong’s philosophy being short of this understanding. In this article the author will use the interpretational structure of the practical theory and the theory of being to analyze the different consciousness in these two systems and suggest that there exist no real conflict between them so as to explain both their philosophical thinking.
Subjects
胡宏
朱熹
存有論
性善論
工夫次第論
Hu Hong
Zhu Hsi
the theory of being
the goodness of nature
the practical procedure theory
SDGs
Type
journal article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
0037_200903_3.pdf
Size
22.86 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):a9b8d1bb0f73f3ae581029866f4535e5