Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma
 
  • Details

Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma

Journal
Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Journal Volume
71
Journal Issue
6
Pages
1632-1636
Date Issued
2011
Author(s)
Chen S.-H.
Chen Y.
Fang W.-K.
Huang D.-W.
Huang K.-C.
SHENG-HONG TSENG  
DOI
10.1097/TA.0b013e3182367b3c
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84355166598&doi=10.1097%2fTA.0b013e3182367b3c&partnerID=40&md5=67a435e46ab5cb7570daa0417d2b234e
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/476153
Abstract
Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is helpful in lowering the intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injuries. However, it is still unclear which surgical approach (DC or craniotomy) is the optimal treatment strategy for severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma (SDH). To clarify this point, we compared the outcomes and complications of the patients with acute SDH and low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score treated with craniotomy or DC. Methods: We analyzed 102 patients with acute SDH and GCS scores of 4 to 8. Of them, 42 patients (41.2%) were treated with craniotomy and 60 (58.8%) treated with DC for evacuation of hematoma. The demographic and clinical data were analyzed including patient age, sex, injury mechanism, GCS score, pupil size and light reflex, time interval from injury to operation, types of surgical procedures, intracranial findings in pre- and postoperative computed tomography scan, intracranial pressure, complications, requirement of permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and Glasgow Outcome Scale score after at least 1 year of follow-up. Results: The craniotomy and DC groups showed no difference in the demographic and clinical data. There was no difference in the outcomes and complication rates between these two groups except that the DC group had higher mortality than the craniotomy group (23.3% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Both craniotomy and DC were feasible treatment strategies for acute SDH. The patients with acute SDH and low GCS score treated with craniotomy or DC showed no difference in the outcomes and complications. Copyright ? 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Subjects
Acute subdural hematoma; Complication; Craniotomy; Decompressive craniectomy; Outcome
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
mannitol; adult; article; assault; brain hematoma; brain infarction; brain ventricle peritoneum shunt; cerebrospinal fluid diversion; cerebrospinal fluid shunting; clinical feature; computer assisted tomography; controlled study; craniotomy; decompressive craniectomy; demography; epidural hematoma; falling; female; follow up; Glasgow coma scale; head injury; human; hypovolemia; injury severity; intracranial hypertension; intracranial pressure; major clinical study; male; neuroimaging; neurosurgery; outcome assessment; pneumonia; postoperative complication; postoperative period; preoperative period; priority journal; pupil; pupil reflex; resuscitation; seizure; sex difference; subdural effusion; subdural hematoma; surgical mortality; surgical technique; traffic accident; treatment outcome; urinary tract infection; Adult; Aged; Brain Injuries; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Craniotomy; Decompressive Craniectomy; Female; Glasgow Coma Scale; Hematoma, Subdural, Acute; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Injury Severity Score; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Taiwan; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science