Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Comparison of effectiveness between anticoagulation and thrombolysis therapy for pulmonary embolism in patients complicated with shock: A nationwide population-based study
 
  • Details

Comparison of effectiveness between anticoagulation and thrombolysis therapy for pulmonary embolism in patients complicated with shock: A nationwide population-based study

Journal
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Journal Volume
120
Journal Issue
8
Pages
1208-1216
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
JEN-KUANG LEE  
Chen W.-H.
Lin Y.-S.
Chang C.-H.
Chen T.-H.
DOI
10.1055/s-0040-1713095
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089301580&doi=10.1055%2fs-0040-1713095&partnerID=40&md5=569c1f9883ba5557accf4e3b2622d8d4
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/596574
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy of anticoagulation therapy and thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients complicated with shock. Methods This retrospective cohort study used administrative data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients admitted due to PE who received inotropic support between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2011, were included. To closely mimic a randomized experiment, anticoagulation and thrombolysis plus anticoagulation groups were subjected to propensity score matching (PSM) according to demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and inotropic agent dosage. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 3-month mortality after discharge. Results After PSM, a total of 820 patients, including 164 thrombolysis and 656 anticoagulation patients, were enrolled. The in-hospital mortality was 48.2% in the thrombolysis group and 52.4% in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.18). Major bleeding occurred in 19 (11.6%) of the thrombolysis patients and 57 (8.7%) of the anticoagulation patients (OR 1.37, 95% CI, 0.79-2.38). The 90-day mortality rates in the thrombolysis and anticoagulation groups were 15.3% (13 patients) and 17.6% (55 patients), respectively; this difference was not significant (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.48-1.61). Conclusion In PE patients complicated with shock, anticoagulation therapy provides similar treatment efficacy to thrombolytic therapy in terms of in-hospital and 90-day mortality. The bleeding risk was also similar in the two treatment groups. ? 2020 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
Subjects
cardiogenic shock; National Health Insurance Research Database; pulmonary embolism; thrombolytic therapy
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
dalteparin; dopamine; enoxaparin; epinephrine; heparin; inotropic agent; nadroparin; noradrenalin; streptokinase; tissue plasminogen activator; urokinase; anticoagulant agent; fibrinolytic agent; adult; aged; anticoagulation; Article; atrial fibrillation; autoimmune disease; bleeding; blood clot lysis; chronic kidney failure; cohort analysis; diabetes mellitus; heart failure; hospital mortality; human; hypertension; ischemic heart disease; lung embolism; lymphoma; male; outcome assessment; population research; propensity score; prospective study; randomized controlled trial (topic); retrospective study; thromboembolism; venous thromboembolism; adverse event; bleeding; cause of death; comorbidity; comparative study; complication; epidemiology; factual database; female; fibrinolytic therapy; follow up; intensive care unit; length of stay; lung embolism; middle aged; mortality; shock; Taiwan; treatment outcome; very elderly; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Databases, Factual; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Hemorrhage; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Pulmonary Embolism; Retrospective Studies; Shock; Taiwan; Thrombolytic Therapy; Treatment Outcome
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science