Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. Forensic Medicine / 法醫學科所
  4. Levofloxacin sequential therapy vs levofloxacin triple therapy in the second-line treatment of helicobacter pylori: A randomized trial
 
  • Details

Levofloxacin sequential therapy vs levofloxacin triple therapy in the second-line treatment of helicobacter pylori: A randomized trial

Journal
American Journal of Gastroenterology
Journal Volume
111
Journal Issue
3
Pages
381-387
Date Issued
2016
Author(s)
JYH-MING LIOU  
Bair M.-J.
CHIEH-CHANG CHEN  
YI-CHIA LEE  
MEI-JYH CHEN  
CHIEN-CHUAN CHEN  
Tseng C.-H.
YU-JEN FANG  
Lee J.-Y.
Yang T.-H.
Luo J.-C.
Wu J.-Y.
Chang W.-H.
Chang C.-C.
Chen C.-Y.
Chen P.-Y.
CHIA-TUNG SHUN  
WEN-FENG HSU  
Hung H.-W.
Lin J.-T.
Chang C.-Y.
MING-SHIANG WU  
DOI
10.1038/ajg.2015.439
URI
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/553136
Abstract
Objectives:The efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy has fallen below 80% in the second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We aimed to assess whether the levofloxacin sequential therapy is more effective than levofloxacin triple therapy in the second-line treatment.Methods:This open-label, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted between 2012 and 2015. H. pylori-infected subjects who failed from clarithromycin-based regimens (N=600) were randomized (1:1) to receive levofloxacin sequential therapy (LS: lansoprazole and amoxicillin for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole, levofloxacin, and metronidazole for another 5 days) or levofloxacin triple therapy (LT: lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and levofloxacin for 10 days). Successful eradication was defined as negative 13 C-urea breath test at least 6 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Antibiotic resistance was determined by agar dilution test.Results:The prevalence of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole resistance was 60, 17.6, and 36.9%, respectively. The eradication rates of LS and LT were 84.3% (253/300) and 75.3% (226/300), respectively, in the ITT analysis (P=0.006) and 86.3% (253/293) and 78.8% (223/283), respectively, in the PP analysis (P=0.021). The efficacies of both LS and LT were affected by levofloxacin resistance. The secondary resistance of levofloxacin was 66.7 and 73.9% after LS and LT, respectively. The efficacies of LS and LT were not affected by the CYP2C19 polymorphism.Conclusions:Levofloxacin sequential therapy was more effective than levofloxacin triple therapy, and it is recommended in the second-line treatment for H. pylori (Trial registration number: NCT01537055). ? 2016 by the American College of Gastroenterology.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
amoxicillin; clarithromycin; cytochrome P450 2C19; lansoprazole; levofloxacin; metronidazole; urea c 13; amoxicillin; antiinfective agent; lansoprazole; levofloxacin; metronidazole; abdominal pain; adult; agar dilution; antibiotic resistance; antibiotic therapy; Article; bloating; constipation; controlled study; diarrhea; dizziness; double blind procedure; drug cost; drug efficacy; drug treatment failure; drug withdrawal; eradication therapy; female; genetic polymorphism; headache; Helicobacter infection; human; intention to treat analysis; major clinical study; male; middle aged; multicenter study; nausea; open study; parallel design; prevalence; priority journal; randomized controlled trial; rash; Taiwan; taste disorder; treatment outcome; urea breath test; vomiting; aged; clinical trial; combination drug therapy; drug administration; drug effects; drug monitoring; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; isolation and purification; microbiology; procedures; Stomach Diseases; Adult; Aged; Amoxicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Lansoprazole; Levofloxacin; Male; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Stomach Diseases; Treatment Outcome
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science