To evaluate the effectiveness of health care ethics consultation based on the goals of health care ethics consultation: A prospective cohort study with randomization
Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Journal Volume
15
Journal Issue
1
Pages
1
Date Issued
2014
Author(s)
Abstract
Background: The growing prevalence of health care ethics consultation (HCEC) services in the U.S. has been accompanied by an increase in calls for accountability and quality assurance, and for the debates surrounding why and how HCEC is evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of HCEC as indicated by several novel outcome measurements in East Asian medical encounters. Methods. Patients with medical uncertainty or conflict regarding value-laden issues, and requests made by the attending physicians or nurses for HCEC from December 1, 2009 to April 30, 2012 were randomly assigned to the usual care group (UC group) and the intervention group (HCEC group). The patients in the HCEC group received HCEC conducted by an individual ethics consultant. Data analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. Mann-Whitney test and Chi-squared test were used depending on the scale of measurement. Results: Thirty-three patients (53.23%) were randomly assigned to the HCEC group and 29 patients were randomly assigned to the UC group. Among the 33 patients in the HCEC group, two (6.06%) of them ultimately did not receive a HCEC service. Among the 29 patients in the UC group, four (13.79%) of them received a HCEC service. The survival rate at hospital discharge did not differ between the two groups. Patients in the HCEC group showed significant reductions in the entire ICU stay and entire hospital stay. HCEC significantly facilitated achieving the goal of medical care (p <.01). Furthermore, patients in the HCEC group had a shorter ICU stay and shorter hospital stay after the occurrence of medical uncertainty or conflict regarding value-laden issues than those in the UC group. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that HCEC were associated with reduced consumption of medical resources as indicated by shorter entire ICU stay, entire hospital stay, and shorter ICU and hospital stay after the occurrence of the medical uncertainty or conflict regarding value-laden issues. This study also showed that HCEC facilitated achieving a consensus regarding the goal of medical care, which conforms to the goal of HCEC. ? 2014 Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Other Subjects
article; bioethics; conflict; controlled clinical trial; controlled study; doctor patient relation; ethics; female; health care quality; human; intensive care; intensive care unit; length of stay; male; multicenter study; outcome assessment; patient care; professional standard; program evaluation; prospective study; randomized controlled trial; standard; statistics; Taiwan; treatment outcome; United States; Bioethics; Conflict (Psychology); Ethics Committees; Ethics Consultation; Female; Humans; Intensive Care; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Male; Medical Futility; Outcome Assessment (Health Care); Patient Care Team; Physician-Patient Relations; Program Evaluation; Prospective Studies; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Taiwan; United States
Type
journal article