Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. National Development / 國家發展研究所
  4. Research on Legal System of Judicial Ethics Regulations
 
  • Details

Research on Legal System of Judicial Ethics Regulations

Date Issued
2012
Date
2012
Author(s)
Chen, Li-Fen
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/254141
Abstract
The question of whether a judicial system will work smoothly depends greatly on the quality of its participants: the judges, prosecutors, and the attorneys. For this reason, post-WWII Japan referred to the above three participants as the “three arms of justice”. The demand for legal ethics originated from mala fide acts committed by legal professionals that violated the nature of their public service. Due to the special nature of a judge’s role, the professional ethics of a judge place particular emphasis on the requirements of independence and fairness. Many factors detrimentally affect the independent decision-making of a judge; amongst them, “corruption” is a concept that has been widely applied in recent years. The author of this thesis considers that the definition and forms of judicial corruption cannot be determined purely from the perspective of whether a crime has been committed. The concept of “judicial corruption” should include any abuse of power or improper act that seeks to derive a personal, illegal gain in any form for the judge him/herself or any other person, that departs from the ideas of judicial fairness and results in a detrimental effect on the judicial system. The provisions of the “United Nations Convention Against Corruption” (UNCAC) demonstrate that the formulation of codes of conduct governing personnel of judicial authorities is not only a feasible means of solving judicial corruption, but is also an international obligation placed upon all member countries by the contemporary international community. According to the “2010/2011 Global Corruption Barometer” released by Transparency International, 42% of the Taiwanese public believe that corruption is most serious amongst the judicial authorities, in comparison to the other departments being evaluated. By examining the cases of affirmed disciplinary action against judges from the period of 1992 to June 2011, the author of this thesis has found that the types of violations committed by judges are mostly negligence, laziness, and lack of proper care in investigations, followed by inappropriate social relationships and financial management. There were also a number of judges who were suspended or permanently dismissed, due to their having severely damaged the fair and honest image of a judge. Therefore, it is indeed necessary for Taiwan to work towards formulating an enforceable code of conduct governing judicial authority personnel, and to implement such code. Presently there are two different international trends in the development of a judges’ code of ethics: one is the mandatory demand for compliance through sanctions; the other is voluntary compliance by judges based on their internally held beliefs. Under Taiwan’s Judges Act, the Judicial Yuan was authorized to issue the Code of Conduct for Judges, after seeking the opinion of the national judges’ representatives, and judges are mandatorily required to comply with this Code. A serious violation of the Code will result in an evaluation; disciplinary action will be imposed under several circumstances if necessary. This shows that Taiwan has followed the first trend. Based on past experience, it is indeed necessary to formulate a judicial conduct code and to equip it with mandatory effect. However, there is also another serious and important issue of how to strike a balance between a code of conduct for judges, and the fundamental rights of judges. The United States was the first country to impose a code of judicial conduct, which is also the most comprehensive. In Asia, Japan and Hong Kong have also been considered to demonstrate relatively high degrees of judicial honesty. This thesis seeks to examine the Code of Conduct for Judges of Taiwan by studying and comparing the codes of judicial conduct of the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, as well as their records of violations, from the perspectives of the fundamental principles of such codes, the carrying out of judicial powers and duties, and activities outside the scope of duties. It is hoped that such a study will uncover and supplement any uncertainties or inadequacies in Taiwan’s existing Code of Conduct for Judges, so that it may serve as a basis for future interpretation of uncertainties, and as a reference for legal amendment by the relevant authorities.
Subjects
legal ethics
judicial ethics
code of judicial conduct
judicial independence
judicial corruption
Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct
Model Code of Judicial Conduct
Guide to Judicial Conduct
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG16

Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

index.html

Size

23.49 KB

Format

HTML

Checksum

(MD5):cda8ecc4d3e4913ffb8987b2d388190b

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science