Study on the Reasonable Service fee for Professional Construction Management (PCM) of Public building Projects
Date Issued
2014
Date
2014
Author(s)
Wang, Kuan-Wen
Abstract
The authority of engineering procurement for budgeting convenient does not consider the vendors providing labor services with engineering properties and the relative cost related labor services content. Mostly, as a " Percentage of Construction Cost Method" to the payment service fee calculation.
In practice, because the current standard ratio of domestic public works budget is about 82.41%, that results manufacturers no real profit at all.
The domestic engineering authorities always set contract provisions of procurement beyond the technical requirements. Since 1999 the Technical Service Regulation implemented so far, project management service fees never been adjusted. On the other hand, domestic public construction period delayed with uncommon condition and caused by a variety of factors, that resulted in labor costs overrun and project management manufacturers compensated nowhere.
Because of these national authorities commissioned project management technology services procurement, which contract performance range and billing issues resulted project management service fees and actual compliance costs significantly there was a gap. Above all is worthy of further study.
This research statistics the last three years project management technical service bulletins tenders propose unreasonable conditions when regular procurement agencies made service contracts.
Then, this study reports recommendations two views, one is authorities more prefer applying the percentage of the construction method that additional services can not be derived from billing issues ,two is technical service rates should be considered a reasonable adjustment factor.
According to the billing relationship with the design , supervision and project management services, as well as the case studies, this paper proposed the suggestions about adjustment expenses for using the "Percentage of Construction Costs Method" and the billing fairness for project management technology services.
In practice, because the current standard ratio of domestic public works budget is about 82.41%, that results manufacturers no real profit at all.
The domestic engineering authorities always set contract provisions of procurement beyond the technical requirements. Since 1999 the Technical Service Regulation implemented so far, project management service fees never been adjusted. On the other hand, domestic public construction period delayed with uncommon condition and caused by a variety of factors, that resulted in labor costs overrun and project management manufacturers compensated nowhere.
Because of these national authorities commissioned project management technology services procurement, which contract performance range and billing issues resulted project management service fees and actual compliance costs significantly there was a gap. Above all is worthy of further study.
This research statistics the last three years project management technical service bulletins tenders propose unreasonable conditions when regular procurement agencies made service contracts.
Then, this study reports recommendations two views, one is authorities more prefer applying the percentage of the construction method that additional services can not be derived from billing issues ,two is technical service rates should be considered a reasonable adjustment factor.
According to the billing relationship with the design , supervision and project management services, as well as the case studies, this paper proposed the suggestions about adjustment expenses for using the "Percentage of Construction Costs Method" and the billing fairness for project management technology services.
Subjects
建造費用百分比法
專案管理
經常採購機關
Type
thesis
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
ntu-103-P00521713-1.pdf
Size
23.32 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):f5c118b3c30c04ea0c02b45daf4d9645