Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Law / 法律學院
  3. Law / 法律學系
  4. Discussion of Issues related to Dividend Payments on the Companies Act And the 2012 Amendments
 
  • Details

Discussion of Issues related to Dividend Payments on the Companies Act And the 2012 Amendments

Date Issued
2014
Date
2014
Author(s)
Yang, Ching-Hsiu
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/262145
Abstract
The issued dividend payment is related to the direction of the company’s operation, and the interests of the shareholders, the creditors of the company and the staff, etc, which is also the year of the fruits of the company employees’ labor. Moreover, it is the year-end inspection of the company’s operation which comes under everyone’s review. Through the provided company''s financial statements and the proposed motion of dividend payment, the shareholders can review and assess whether the company''s management team make any contribution to the company’s operation in the whole year, whether the authorities actually implement the regulations or not? Did they carry out unhealthy speculation hype secretly or did someone conduct insider trading? All the phenomenon mentioned above can be learned through the dividend payment issued that year. Nevertheless, in order to let the enterprise keep autonomous, our legislation does not dwell on this too much. But in 2012, under the input of the principles of corporate governance, our country’s Company Law did make a change. For example, not only the relaxing use of the public fund, the aspects about how the board directors of the company disclose the information to the shareholders, but the existing 183 Provision of the issues about the shareholders'' meeting decision, and 230 Provision about the distribution obligations of the lists should be communicated by way of announcement. What’s more, the minutes of the shareholders'' meeting should be taken by way of electronic. Thus, conveying information to the shareholders by way of electronic is more quickly and conveniently. Since our country’s company laws regulate that the distribution of dividend payment is the share privilege of the shareholders and the Board, yet currently only after the Board proposes the motion of the issued distribution of the stock surplus, then the shareholders can express whether they recognize it or not. As a result, isn’t it without any doubt that this unilateral recognition of the opinion is the best guarantee to the shareholders and meets the legislative intent of sharing the rights together? Furthermore, since the shareholders may subsequently recognize it or not, yet there are no relevant legislative provisions about the disclosure of the information. Currently, the government only regulates the Board of the directors to propose the relevant information. Nevertheless, the sound strict system of information disclosure is to prevent the major shareholders of listed companies and operating team from encroaching the company''s interests and it’s also an important means of protecting the public investors. Our country’s Company Law doesn’t allow the shareholders to express their opinions about the proposal of the surplus in advance. Later on, there are no comprehensive measures of protection toward information disclosure, and eventually, the Law requires the shareholders to recognize the distribution of the surplus. Such policy decision is disguisedly equivalent to the fact that actually, the shareholders must accept the conclusions of the motion about the issued proceeds. Nevertheless, this is quiet contrary to the original design about the right of sharing the surplus. As for the right of information disclosure, probably, the investors can get the message at the Observation Post, but there is no mandatory requirement on how companies should disclose the process of the dividend payment. That is, there’s no company''s dividend policy on how the company makes the relevant determinants of the current year and what’s the company''s operating directions, etc. Therefore, this thesis is going to discuss the interests of the investors and how to make laws to protect regulations and prompt the development and guarantee of the creditors of the company as well.
Subjects
股利發放
資訊揭露
共享權
股利政策
債權人保護
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-103-R97a21040-1.pdf

Size

23.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):19c80899eb71f7a8f39e27013b720514

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science