Investigating Market Manipulation Regulation under Criminal Policy
Date Issued
2012
Date
2012
Author(s)
Chang, Chun-Hsiang
Abstract
Symbolic intermediary role of the “Market Manipulation Criminal Legal System (MMCLS)” seems to have some degree of play in Taiwan, varying from the low practice of MMCLS in United States and Britain, with subjective intent requirements disorder, penalties extremely placed in front, and extremely broad general articles.
The legislation of this kind, so rough without holistic thinking, panders to current "staged demonization" and "wave of sacrifice for the flag ", because of the coupling of the financial law and criminal law desires no kidnapping of a MMCLS in line with basic criminal law principles and elaborate discourse mechanism but rather a bohemian criminalization machine, through the willful swaying and make-up of the discourse of financial jargons, to neglect basic criminal law principles and further to play its symbolic intermediary role in order to cover the weakness of administrative regulation and the deficiency of civil protection.
Subjects
Market Manipulation
Criminal Policy
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 10b-5
Financial Services Act 1986
market abuse
SDGs
Type
thesis
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
index.html
Size
23.27 KB
Format
HTML
Checksum
(MD5):1f6dc45554de279a621aece88cd42165