Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections
 
  • Details

A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Journal Volume
12
Date Issued
2012
Author(s)
Matthews, Peter
Alpert, Marc
Rahav, Galia
Rill, Denise
Zito, Edward
Gardiner, David
Pedersen, Ron
Babinchak, Timothy
McGovern, Paul C
HSIANG-CHI KUNG etc.  
DOI
10.1186/1471-2334-12-297
URI
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84868633430&partnerID=MN8TOARS
http://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/371751
Abstract
Background: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality.Methods: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196).Results: In the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group.Conclusions: Tigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537. ? 2012 Matthews et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Subjects
CSSSI; Glycylcycline; Skin and skin structure infection; Tigecycline
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid; sultamicillin; tigecycline; vancomycin; abdominal pain; adult; anemia; antibiotic sensitivity; anxiety; article; cellulitis; comparative study; constipation; controlled study; debridement; diarrhea; dizziness; drug efficacy; drug safety; dyspepsia; Enterobacter cloacae; Enterococcus; eradication therapy; Escherichia coli; female; fever; headache; human; hypertension; hypokalemia; insomnia; intention to treat analysis; Klebsiella pneumoniae; major clinical study; male; methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus; microbiological examination; minimum inhibitory concentration; nausea; open study; pain; phase 3 clinical trial; phase 4 clinical trial; Proteus; pruritus; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; randomized controlled trial; side effect; skin infection; soft tissue infection; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcus agalactiae; Streptococcus anginosus; Streptococcus pyogenes; surgical drainage; thorax pain; treatment outcome; vomiting; Adult; Aged; Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination; Ampicillin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Minocycline; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Skin Diseases, Infectious; Sulbactam
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science