Co-infections among patients with COVID-19: The need for combination therapy with non-anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents?
Journal
Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
Journal Volume
53
Journal Issue
4
Pages
505-512
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Abstract
Co-infection has been reported in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome, but there is limited knowledge on co-infection among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The prevalence of co-infection was variable among COVID-19 patients in different studies, however, it could be up to 50% among non-survivors. Co-pathogens included bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumonia, Legionella pneumophila and Acinetobacter baumannii; Candida species and Aspergillus flavus; and viruses such as influenza, coronavirus, rhinovirus/enterovirus, parainfluenza, metapneumovirus, influenza B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Influenza A was one of the most common co-infective viruses, which may have caused initial false-negative results of real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Laboratory and imaging findings alone cannot help distinguish co-infection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Newly developed syndromic multiplex panels that incorporate SARS-CoV-2 may facilitate the early detection of co-infection among COVID-19 patients. By contrast, clinicians cannot rule out SARS-CoV-2 infection by ruling in other respiratory pathogens through old syndromic multiplex panels at this stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, clinicians must have a high index of suspicion for coinfection among COVID-19 patients. Clinicians can neither rule out other co-infections caused by respiratory pathogens by diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection nor rule out COVID-19 by detection of non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens. After recognizing the possible pathogens causing co-infection among COVID-19 patients, appropriate antimicrobial agents can be recommended. ? 2020
Subjects
Co-infection; COVID-19; Influenza viruses; SARS-CoV-2
SDGs
Other Subjects
amoxicillin; antifungal agent; azithromycin; ceftriaxone; doxycycline; moxifloxacin; oseltamivir; quinolone derivative; antiinfective agent; Acinetobacter baumannii; Acinetobacter infection; antibiotic therapy; antiviral therapy; Aspergillus flavus; Candida; candidiasis; Chlamydia pneumoniae; chlamydial pneumonia; Coronavirinae; coronavirus disease 2019; Enterovirus; Enterovirus infection; false negative result; human; Human immunodeficiency virus; infectious agent; influenza; influenza A; influenza B; Influenza B virus; Influenza virus; invasive aspergillosis; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Klebsiella pneumoniae infection; laboratory test; Legionella pneumophila; legionnaire disease; Metapneumovirus; Metapneumovirus infection; Middle East respiratory syndrome; mixed infection; multiplex polymerase chain reaction; Mycoplasma pneumonia; Mycoplasma pneumoniae; pandemic; Parainfluenza virus infection; pneumococcal infection; prevalence; real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; respiratory syncytial virus infection; Review; Rhinovirus; Rhinovirus infection; secondary infection; severe acute respiratory syndrome; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Staphylococcus aureus; Staphylococcus aureus infection; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Betacoronavirus; combination drug therapy; Coronavirus infection; diagnostic kit; isolation and purification; laboratory technique; mixed infection; practice guideline; virus pneumonia; Anti-Infective Agents; Betacoronavirus; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Coinfection; Coronavirus Infections; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Type
review