Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. Sociology / 社會學系
  4. Governing the Risk of Child Development: Developmental Delay, Surveillance Network and Parenting Politics
 
  • Details

Governing the Risk of Child Development: Developmental Delay, Surveillance Network and Parenting Politics

Date Issued
2010
Date
2010
Author(s)
Tseng, Fan-Tzu
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/248082
Abstract
 In Taiwan, “Early Treatment” was embedded into the Child Welfare Law, defining “developmental delay” as a risk factor in disability and thus a target in need of treatment as early as possible. This new subject/object marked the expansion of child health policies in Taiwan from control of contagious diseases to disability prevention for all children. This dissertation traces the process of assembling what I call “the regime of developmental risk,” and examines how parenting in daily child-rearing and treatment for developmentally delayed children engage deeply with this social transformation. My research was conducted as a multi-site ethnography, and gathered materials through document analysis, participant observation, and interviews with fifteen professionals across various domains in addition to fifty-eight caregivers rearing children under the age of ten.  In Part I of this dissertation, I analyze the transformation of the target of Early Treatment in Taiwan from “children with disabilities” to “children with developmental delays.” Although this process seemed to be a typical case of “medicalization,” it developed very different driving engines, strategies, and social arrangements. By tracing a social-political process full of contingencies, I demonstrate how a new regime of developmental risk emerged. Compared to the medicalized regime of disability, this risk regime produced very different subjects, purposes, power techniques, rhetoric strategies, and social scripts for actors. I argue that this risk regime is characterized by collective governance. Therefore, it needs various scientific claims and technologies to structure the developmental gaze at children for different actors, stabilize the surveillance practices across heterogeneous social worlds, as well as ensure the validity of individual children’s information as gathered by different agents.  The second part of the dissertation turns to the micro level. I use concepts of lay knowledge and user-professional relationships to elaborate the subjectivity issue rarely articulated in a traditional medicalization thesis or government framework. In the continuum between normalcy and disability, different locations assigned to each child would influence mostly their parents’ negotiation space with the risk regime. Because any social actor necessarily lives in multiple life worlds and faces intersecting practice regimes, her/his risk perception and management must have multiple levels. Especially in the case of parents with developmentally delayed children, the Early Treatment system in Taiwan appears hydra-headed, without integration or even consensus. For them, the management of child’s delayed body always confront with various issues of treatment uncertainty. As a result, parents not only use treatment resources, but also need to do sophisticated “articulation work” to ensure the whole treatment project for their specific child. In my opinion, they are a kind of “logistician.” Although parents’ engagement might not challenge the final target of this institutional governance, their actions indeed go far beyond the original social script set by the risk regime.  Finally, the contributions of this dissertation may be as follows: Facing the ever-changing issues of health and disease in present society, a framework of risk governance may be more appropriate than a medicalization paradigm to analyze how our society responds to various body controversies with blurred boundaries between normalcy and abnormalcy. In addition, parenthood, as the context of risk management, is characterized by an entanglement of morality, emotions, and individuality. Taking these peculiarities into consideration will enrich and deepen our understandings of governance techniques and lay expertise, as well as the co-production of, and contradiction between, practice regime and agent.
Subjects
Risk Governance / Management
Early Treatment Program
Developmental Delay
Surveillance Network
Parenting Politics
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-99-D92325001-1.pdf

Size

23.53 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):6354c05cfba63275775e98609839a7c7

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science