習慣與性格特質兩概念的分析與比較:以柯氏基本習慣與EYSENCK等人性格特質的比較為例
Date Issued
2000
Date
2000
Author(s)
柯永河
DOI
892413H002005SSS
Abstract
This study has two objects, one is to
compare the concepts of habit and that of
personality trait to see which one of them is
superior in predicting the academic
achievement of the senior high school
students, and the other object is to find out
how the personality theorist dose differently
from the habit theorist in the stage of
measuring personality traits and habits,
respectively.
In order to find out the answer to the
first object, the present research used two
instruments; the first instrument is the eight
subscales in the Cattle’s 16 PF. Each of them
was found to be a valuable factor in
predicting the academic achievement of
senior high school students, and the second
instrument is a study habit scale developed
by the present researcher himself according
to the definition of habit, as written down
also by the present researcher. The internal
consistency chronbach α values of most
subscales were within the acceptable range.
A battery of questionnaires consisting of
the above-mentioned two instruments was
administered to a group of 2018 senior high
school students, including male and female
students attending in 15 different senior high
schools in Taipei area. Some of the senior
high schools are top ranked and some are
bottom ranked and the rest are middle ranked
in the academic quality of the school as a
whole.
The data obtained were analyzed using
the stepwise multiple correlation analysis;
Firstly the analysis was applied to the data
obtained from the eight subscales of the 16PF,
and secondarily to the data from the 14
subscales of the Study Habits Questionnaires,
and finally to the data from both the 16PF
and the Study Habit Questionnaires.
The results revealed (i) that the study
habit scores are significantly superior to the
16PF scores in predicting the academic
achievement of senior high school students,
implying that the concept of study habits is a
much better than that of personality traits, at
least in the task of predicting academic
achievement of the senior high school
students; and (ii) that some of the16PF scores
are complementary to study habit scores in
making a better prediction of academic
achievement of the senior high school
students.
In order to find out the answer to the
second object of the present study, the 240
items of the Neo PI-R Form S were analyzed
itemwise according to the basic structure of
habit items as described by the present
researcher. The results of the analysis
revealed that about 56% of items in the Neo
PI-R Form S are written exactly in the basic
form of a typical habit test item as described
by the present researcher previously. Further4
more, it was found that some scale of the
Neo PI-R Form S even contained 100% of
habit-type items. The present investigator,
therefore, proposed that in the future study,
the basic or stereotyped form of personality
traits item be clearly defined, so that every
personality inventory should contain only the
test item which is clearly different from the
habit item style but perfectly fits to the basic
form of the personality traits.
Subjects
Academic achievement
Habits Study habits
Personality traits
Publisher
臺北市：國立臺灣大學心理學系暨研究所
Type
report
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
892413H002005SSS.pdf
Size
68.88 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):3dc965685fed92771c11acfb1718c987