Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Public Health / 公共衛生學院
  3. Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine / 流行病學與預防醫學研究所
  4. Comparative Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections -- A systematic review and network meta-analysis
 
  • Details

Comparative Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections -- A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Date Issued
2012
Date
2012
Author(s)
Chang, Cheng-Yu
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/250246
Abstract
Background:Bacterial resistance has risen dramatically during the last few decades and infections caused by Gram-positive organisms constituting nowadays the main cause of sepsis in in-hospital patients. In the United States, more than 60% of the Gram-positive organisms isolates in intensive care units are methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus now (MRSA). In Taiwan nosocomial surveillance system reports, the prevalence of MRSA in Gram-positive organisms is up to 80% in medical centers. There is uncertainty as to whether vancomycin in cause permanent or temporary kidney damage. Many studies have shown an increased risk of kidney failure after vancomycin treatment. At least five agents of antibiotics, including vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, tigecycline and telavancin can against MRSA infection. The efficacies and nephrotoxicity of different antibiotics have been studies by traditional meta-analysis method. However, for clinical decisions, we need to know the safety and effective of each possible in comparison with all relevant alternatives, not just one. We conducted a network meta-analysis study of comparative nephrotoxicity and efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Method: We searched the Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed databases to identify published clinical trials in which vancomycin, linezolid, telavancin, teicoplanin and tigecycline were used to treat Gram positive infection from January 1988 to December 2011. We also searched trials in “clnicaltrials.gov” which is a service of clinical trial registry in U.S. National institutes of Health. Among included articles, the following variables were abstracted and collected in a standardized form: authors; year of publication ; study design; gender; mean age; number of patients ; site of infection; antimicrobial agents and dosages used ; microorganism species and susceptibility; clinical cure outcome; microbiological eradication; survival; adverse events; and serious adverse events. The safety outcome is nephrotoxicity and efficacy outcomes are clinical cure and microbiological eradication. We analyzed direct and indirect comparisons of different treatments using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results:Literature searching and systematic review identified 390 non-duplicate citations, of which 26 trials comprising 8094 participants were included. In direct comparison, lower risk of nephrotoxicity in teicoplanin compared with vancomycin (OR: 0.37, 95% C.I: 0.19-0.70). There was no statistical difference in clinical cure between these antibiotic agents. In microbiological eradication, linezolid is significant more effective than vancomycin (OR: 1.29, 95%C.I: 1.02-1.63). In indirect comparison, telavancin was the antibiotics of most high risk nephrotoxicity than others, compare with teicoplanin (OR: 8.63, 95% credible interval (CrI): 2.26-66.47) and linezolid (OR: 6.88, 95%CrI: 1.50-58.15). The lower risk of nephrotoxicity with teicoplanin was observed. Compared with vancomycin, teicoplanin showed significant decrease the risk of nephrotoxicity (OR: 0.29, 95%CrI: 0.11-0.67). Linezolid was superior to vancomycin in clinical cure (OR: 1.4, 95%CrI: 1.01-1.93) and microbiological eradication (OR: 1.32, 95%CrI: 1.03-1.7). Conclusion:Telavancin is associated with a greater risk of renal toxicity than other comparators. It is a novel concept in traditional and network meta-analysis study. Teicoplanin appear the lower risk of nephrotoxicity in treatment of Gram positive bacterial infection. Linezolid showed a significant superior efficacy in clinical cure and microbiological eradication than others. Better performed randomized trials on antibiotic treatment of Gram-positive infection are needed to build a more robust network meta-analysis.
Subjects
Gram-positive bacilli
methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
nephrotoxicity
clinical cure
microbiological eradication
network meta-analysis
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-101-R99849034-1.pdf

Size

23.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):f74b9d776353436992fb7defa3d45be3

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science