Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: A randomized trial
 
  • Details

Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: A randomized trial

Journal
European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Journal Volume
153
Journal Issue
2
Pages
198-202
Date Issued
2010
Author(s)
Chou L.-Y.
BOR-CHING SHEU  
DAW-YUAN CHANG  
Huang S.-C.
Chen S.-Y.
Hsu W.-C.
WEN-CHUN CHANG  
DOI
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.029
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78249288429&doi=10.1016%2fj.ejogrb.2010.07.029&partnerID=40&md5=74a8de0d42333c7d003f21f8b2e158b8
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/546081
Abstract
Objective: To compare the feasibility, operative time, specimen retrieval time, and effect on postoperative pain of laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses between a 10-mm transumbilical and a 10-mm transabdominal port. Study design: Fifty women with adnexal masses who were scheduled for a laparoscopic procedure between July 2008 and April 2009 were enrolled. The patients were randomized into two groups; these were patients where a transumbilical port was used for specimen retrieval (transumbilical group, n = 25) and patients where a transabdominal port was used for specimen retrieval (transabdominal group, n = 25). Preoperative suspicion of malignancy and indications suggesting a need for hysterectomy or myomectomy were considered to be exclusion criteria. Randomization was centralized and computer-based. Patients recorded the severity of incisional pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) with 0 meaning no pain and 10 meaning unbearable pain. Results: There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, umbilical thickness, abdominal thickness, cyst size, cyst amount, cyst weight, histology, complications and duration of hospital stay when the two groups were compared. Patients in the transumbilical group had a significantly shorter specimen retrieval time (0.7 ± 1.8 min vs. 4.9 ± 12.6 min, p = 0.006) and a significantly lower postoperative day (POD) 0 VAS pain score (5.2 ± 2.1 vs. 6.6 ± 2.2, p = 0.015). Significantly fewer patients in the transumbilical group had a specimen retrieval time of ?10 min (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.025) and a POD 0 VAS pain score of >5 (36% vs. 84%, p < 0.001). However, the average POD 1 VAS pain score (3.2 ± 1.8, vs. 3.6 ± 1.6) and the proportion with a POD 1 VAS pain score >5 (12% vs. 12%) were similar for the two groups. Conclusion: When laparoscopic surgery on benign adnexal masses is carried out using a 10-mm incision wound, removal of the specimen via the umbilical port has a shorter retrieval time and produces less postoperative pain than retrieval via a lateral abdominal port. ? 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
naproxen; paracetamol; adult; age distribution; article; benign adnexal tumor; body mass; clinical article; computer analysis; controlled study; cystectomy; disease severity; feasibility study; female; histopathology; hospitalization; human; hysterectomy; laparoscopic surgery; myomectomy; operation duration; ovariectomy; pain assessment; postoperative pain; preoperative evaluation; priority journal; skin incision; surgical technique; tumor volume; umbilicus; uterus tumor; visual analog scale
Publisher
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science