Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. The Inter-rater Reliability of Volitional Questionnaire Chinese Version
 
  • Details

The Inter-rater Reliability of Volitional Questionnaire Chinese Version

Date Issued
2016
Date
2016
Author(s)
Chen, Wei-Ann
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/277232
Abstract
Background and Purpose Many people with mental illness often appear to low motivation which result in poor activity participation and reduce the effectiveness of rehabilitation. In this study, we use the Chinese version of Volitional Questionnaire (VQ-C) to assess the client’s motivational status, the level of volition, of the activity participation, and to understand how the environment affects their volition. The evidence of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the VQ-C had been studied previously. Since the VQ-C is conducted by assessing the level of volition after observing clients’ performance, the score results from different rater should be consistent. Thus, the purpose of this study is to examine the inter-rater reliability of the VQ-C conducted by well-trained clinical occupational therapists, and with a view to establish a model which can be the foundation for clinical occupational therapists to assess the clients’ participation motivation objectively and effectively, and can be expected to be one of the indexes of the evidence-based for clinical treatment in the future. Methods There are 3 raters in this study and the professional work experiences are 18, 14, and 11 years accordingly. Before the assessment, the raters need to read the manual of the VQ-C and practiced assessing a standard client followed by comparison and discussion with each other. Through complementing the standard of assessment more detail, it can be the criterion of scoring the research clients. Data of 100 participations with mental illness were collected in this study. Each client participated in one operating type activity chosen by self and the other one assigned by therapist. Meanwhile, at least 2 therapists conduct the score according to the client’s performance, and then clients need to complete other scales. All clients were recruited from psychiatric wards of a medical center in northern Taiwan. Data collection was conducted from March 2014 to November 2014. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Tri-Service General Hospital. We use the Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement Model, ICC, and multiple rater kappa to probe into the inter-rater reliability, and the statistical analysis was conducted by FACETS (version 3.71.4) and SPSS (version 17.0). Results The average age of the 100 clients is 47.8 years old (SD=12.6), 59 clients are men (59%), 37% of clients are schizophrenia, and the average number of year of onset is 12.5 years (SD=9.8). The separation index of the VQ-C is 6.42 and the separation reliability is 0.98. The rater consistency is 89.1%, the ICC is 0.84 (95% CI = 0.7~0.93, F = 16.91, p = 0.00), and the kappa of 14 items are between 0.348 to 0.663. It shows the VQ-C has acceptable inter-rater reliability, but still has a significant difference in rater severity. There are differential item functioning (DIF) of the VQ-C in diagnosis and activity type. Conclusion The Chinese version Volitional Questionnaire has fair inter-rater reliability. It is a reliable and effective observational assessment tool of volitional function. The difference of the severity between therapists in rating content will need to be described in detail and concrete continually to improve the consistency of the therapist, but as a basis for future use, it also need to establish a specific item difficulty index in different diagnosis and types of activities. Activity types used in this study is limited (limited to operating type activities), and it will need further verify the scoring consistency of different forms of activity, and establish the standard procedures of rater training program to improve the reliability of the VQ-C.
Subjects
Activity motivation
Volitional Questionnaire
Inter-rater Reliability
Rasch measurement model
Rating scale
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-105-R94429008-1.pdf

Size

23.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):b32b6abd2a962ded6dd9cdc41e3114e2

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science