Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Public Health / 公共衛生學院
  3. Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine / 流行病學與預防醫學研究所
  4. Weighing the Causal Pies in Case-Control Studies
 
  • Details

Weighing the Causal Pies in Case-Control Studies

Journal
Annals of Epidemiology
Journal Volume
20
Journal Issue
7
Pages
568-573
Date Issued
2010
Author(s)
Liao S.-F.
WEN-CHUNG LEE  
DOI
10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.04.003
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77953560683&doi=10.1016%2fj.annepidem.2010.04.003&partnerID=40&md5=5419ba5336ab4bf9417bfc889264fa5d
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/521903
Abstract
Purpose: Epidemiologists are familiar with the concepts of Rothman's causal pies. Using real data the Hoffman study showed recently how to calculate the " proportion of diseased subjects who develop the disease due to classes of sufficient causes" (PDCs). The PDC is actually an attributable-fraction index. It may be specific to a particular risk factor profile but it does not correspond to any given class of causal pies. In this study, we show how to estimate the " causal-pie weights" (CPWs), so that each and every class of causal pies has one and only one CPW attached to it. Methods: To conform to Rothman's model, we apply a non-negative linear odds model to constrain all the odds ratios (ORs) to be equal to or greater than one, and the interactions between them to be additive or superadditive. Based on these constrained ORs, we calculate the population attributable fractions, and then the CPWs. We used a published case-control data to show the methodology. Results: The CPWs succinctly quantify the relative importance of different classes of causal pies. Conclusions: The proposed method helps to clarify the multi-factorial and complex interactive effects in disease causation. It also provides important information for designing an efficient public health intervention strategy. ? 2010 Elsevier Inc.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
article; bootstrapping; case control study; causal modeling; causal pie weight; hypertension; hypothesis; intervention study; methodology; obesity; priority journal; public health; risk factor; smoking; epidemiology; human; regression analysis; risk; statistical model; Case-Control Studies; Causality; Epidemiologic Methods; Humans; Models, Statistical; Odds Ratio; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors; Case-Control Studies; Causality; Epidemiologic Methods; Humans; Models, Statistical; Odds Ratio; Regression Analysis; Risk Factors
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science