漢宋《孝經》學論考
Journal
國立臺灣大學中國文學研究所碩士論文
Date Issued
2010
Author(s)
Abstract
The Classic of Filial Piety（《孝經》）was higly appraised by the scholars in Han and Tang Dynasty. However, the classic had been criticized due to its cinfusing author, published time and content since Song Dynasty. Hsiao Ching K'an Wu（《孝經刊誤》）by Chu Hsi（朱熹）was the representative which addressed the above questions. The current research carries on the previous awareness and aims to examine the text from the beginning, drawing the conclusion from the comments derived from the Confucianists in the Sung and Ch'ing dynasty as well as excavated texts. The result is that the author of the Classic of Filial Piety took the Confucianism as the principal ideology. Furthermore, the author absorbed the thinking of Mo（墨）and Tao（道）. The content of the Classic of Filial Piety was the dominant school before Han Fei（韓非）. Regarding the study of the Classic of Filial Piety, the current study research aims to investigate the development from Han through Song dynasty with regard to the study of the Classic of Filial Piety. The classic retained its academic standing and influenced subsequent ceremonies as well as the politics due to political reasons. The study of the classic followed the rise of Ch'en-wei（讖緯）, deriving beliefs embedded in the culture which was the mainstream in the Han dynasty. The research uses Hsiao Ching Zhushu（《孝經注疏》）to prove that the classic was the foundation of the connection between Ming Chiao（名教）and Tzu Jan（自然）in order to explain the blank between the Han and the Tang Dynasty. On the other hand, the study of the classic moved away from Tsai I（災異）and cultivated the idea of Chien Cheng（諫諍）through the Emperors and Confucians' commentary. During Song dynasty, Sima Guang（司馬光）and his party developed special concept for the classic. However, its influence died out resulted from doubts of Confucian classics. Even though there were some scholars such as Lu Jiuyuan（陸九淵）who strived for the Classic of Filial Piety, the trend was inevitable.
Type
thesis