COMPARISON CRITERIONS BETWEEN BIM-BASED QUANTITY TAKEOFF METHOD AND TRADITIONAL METHOD IN CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATION - LESSONS LEARNED FROM VIETNAM CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Other Title
建築成本估算中基於BIM的工程量估算方法與傳統方法的比較標準－越南建築專案的經驗教訓
Journal
中國土木水利工程學刊
Journal Volume
37
Journal Issue
2
Start Page
147
End Page
156
ISSN
1015-5856
Date Issued
2025-04
Author(s)
Abstract
This research focuses on the comparison of effectiveness between BIM-based QTO method and Traditional method, in terms of these method's suitability on Vietnam cost estimation process and the accuracy of quantity results extracted of these two approaches. Therefore, to conduct the comparison of these two technique's suitability on the QTO and cost estimates in Vietnam, an online survey was distributed in order to find out the perspective of two group of people: People applying Traditional method (Group 1) and People applying BIM-based QTO method (Group 2). At the same time, a case study was conducted to compare and evaluate the accuracy of quantity results extracted from the Traditional method and BIM-based QTO method. Overall, the study indicated that BIM-based method and Manual QTO method both have their own strong points.
本研究聚焦於以BIM為基礎的QTO（數量計算）方法與傳統方法之間的效果比較，以上述方法對越南造價估算過程的適用性以及這兩種方法所提取的數量結果的準確性進行評估。因此，為了比較這兩種技術在越南QTO和造價估算方面的適用性，本研究進行了一項線上表格調查，以了解兩組人的觀點：應用傳統方法的人（第一組）和應用基於BIM的QTO方法的人（第二組）。同時，進行了一個案例研究，比較和評估從傳統方法和基於BIM的QTO方法中提取的數量結果的準確性。總的來說，研究表明，基於BIM的方法和手動QTO方法都各有其優勢。
Subjects
quantity takeoff (QTO)
cost estimation
BIM-based QTO
traditional method
工程量估算（QTO）
費用估算
基於BIM的QTO
傳統方法
Type
journal article