Biomechanical comparison of different suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair surgery–all‐suture anchors are equivalent to other suture anchors: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
Journal
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal Volume
10
Journal Issue
1
ISSN
2197-1153
2197-1153
Date Issued
2023-01
Author(s)
Yang, Yi‐Shiuan
Shih, Chien‐An
Fang, Ching‐Ju
Huang, Tzu‐Teng
Hsu, Kai‐Lan
Kuan, Fa‐Chuan
Su, Wei‐Ren
Abstract
Purpose: Suture anchors are commonly used to repair rotator cuff tendons in arthroscopy surgery, and several anchor materials have been created to maximize pull-out strength and minimize iatrogenic damage. We hypothesized that all-suture anchors have biomechanical properties equivalent to those of conventional anchors. Our purpose is to compare the biomechanical properties of different anchors used for rotator cuff repair.
Methods: The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched for biomechanical studies on various suture anchors. The search keywords included rotator cuff tears and suture anchors, and two authors conducted study a selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. The failure load, stiffness, and displacement were calculated using the mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Failure modes were estimated using summary odds ratios with 95% CIs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was used for the relative ranking probabilities. A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding studies using synthetic bones.
Results: The polyetheretherketone (PEEK) (p < 0.001) and all-suture anchors (p < 0.001) had higher failure loads than the biocomposite anchors, whereas no significant difference was observed in stiffness among the anchors. The all-suture (p = 0.006) and biocomposite anchors (p < 0.001) had displacements higher than the metal anchors. The relative ranking of the included anchors in failure loads and displacement changed in sensitivity analysis. The meta-analysis did not find significant differences, but the relative ranking probabilities suggested that all-suture anchor had a higher rate of anchor pull-out and a lower rate of eyelet or suture breakage. In contrast, the metal anchors were associated with a higher number of eyelet breakage episodes.
Conclusions: All-suture anchors showed significantly higher failure loads than the biocomposite anchors and similar cyclic displacements to the biocomposite and PEEK anchors. There were no significant differences in stiffness between all-suture and conventional suture anchors. The relative ranking of biomechanical properties changed in sensitivity analysis, suggesting the potential effect of bone marrow density.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
Subjects
All-suture anchors
Biocomposite anchors
Metal anchors
PEEK anchor
Rotator cuff injuries
Rotator cuff repair
Suture anchors
Publisher
Wiley
Type
journal article