Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Law / 法律學院
  3. Law / 法律學系
  4. Constitutional Rights of Detainees-Lessons from American Law
 
  • Details

Constitutional Rights of Detainees-Lessons from American Law

Date Issued
2011
Date
2011
Author(s)
Huang, Hui-I
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/249592
Abstract
This thesis focuses on the rights of pretrial detainees and discusses how pretrial detainees should be treated, whether jail conditions differ from prison conditions, by what and how can prisoners claim their constitutional rights. Taiwan’s Judicial Yuan Interpretation No.653 and No. 654 prompted Detention Act Proposal. However, most of the context of this new act is vague such as “necessary to assure the purpose of detention and the security of jail.” Whether detainees can assert their rights will largely depend on how the court interpreted the concept in each case. As to the conditions of confinement, American Supreme Court held in Bell v. Wolfish that in evaluating the constitutionality of conditions or restrictions of pretrial detention, the proper inquiry is whether those conditions or restrictions amount to punishment of the detainee. Supreme Court applied the reasonable relationship test, which only demands a rational relation to a legitimate goal. The Eighth Amendment entailed in the Due Process Clause mark the lowed level of confinement conditions. This article then addresses the standards and factors courts apply in different case, including overcrowding, double-ceiling, food, exercise, medical care, mail censorship, visits, cell shake-down search, and strip search case. To summarize, this thesis proposed pretrial detainees should not be treated as convicted prisoners, and the test should stricter than the reasonable relation test. Taiwan Law can learn from the theoretical analysis and empirical source of American case law to detail and interpret the standards for determining the rights or detainees.
Subjects
conditions of confinement
pretrial detention
medical care
refuse to medical care
mail censorship
shake-down search
strip search
Detention Act Proposal
Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-100-R95A21073-1.pdf

Size

23.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):cdb70c80e957f67c311182193c1c304a

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science