Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. Political Science / 政治學系
  4. Comparison of Advantages and Disadvantages Between Presidential and Parliamentary Governments
 
  • Details

Comparison of Advantages and Disadvantages Between Presidential and Parliamentary Governments

Resource
政治科學論叢, 6, 001-032
Journal
政治科學論叢
Journal Issue
6
Pages
001-032
Date Issued
1995-05
Date
1995-05
Author(s)
Lu, R.C.
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/281734
Abstract
The author described the characteristics of both types of government first, then compared these two types of government with fifty two criteria. It is superior of parliamentary government of presidential ones in twenty-four aspects such as political deadlock, popular sovereignty, political accountability, neutrality of the head of state, cooperation of executive & legislature, quality of laws, clear and effective government, misuse of power, political assassination, crisis of mediorcrity, politician vs. statesman, party discipline, contingent ability, reasonable budgeting, prevention of promotion by luck, political partronage, interference from first lady, selfish amnesty, international credit, reluctant separation of powers, putting elite aside, move personnel here and there, moral model, pretending be elegant. But the supremacy of presidential government is obvious in ten criteria such as governmental stability, right person right position, national necessity, care one but neglect the other, expert administration, executive tyranny, freedom of congressman, new appearance of political arena, hero worship, political equality. As to the common advantages, there are fifteen points can be mention, such as constitutional democracy, majority rule, officials elected by the people, bad officials can be remove by citizens, limited government, rule of law, judicial independence, protection of civil rights, free election, party politics, loyal opposition, healthy leaders, institutionization of conflict, political stability, avoidance of passionate politics, reform according to public opinion, etc. The two weak points of both systems are over exploitation and overemphasis of competition.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG16

Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science