從研究產出探討人文社會學者學術評鑑之特性
Journal
圖書資訊學刊
Journal Volume
2
Journal Issue
3/4
Pages
1-19
Date Issued
2004
Abstract
This article attempts to investigate the characteristics of research evaluations for social science and humanity researchers. A successful research evaluation should include all the publication media used by their researchers. In social science and humanity studies, articles and books are the two most commonly used scientific publication media, but several other publication media play an important role in some disciplines too. In additions, books always receive high citation rate. Also, social science and humanity researches deal with local and regional problems more often and cite earlier articles than are in sciences. Thus, any evaluation that covered only articles or books would probably be incomplete to varying degrees. A window of longer years for evaluation would be more appropriate for social science and humanity researchers. (Article content in Chinese with English abstract)
Subjects
學術評鑑
人文社會科學
書目計量
Research evaluation
Social science and humanity
Bibliometrics
Type
journal article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
j24-1.pdf
Size
1.53 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):9eb22105b978cd3e65fcde2fa0839310