Dual Antithrombotic Therapy versus Anticoagulant Monotherapy for Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients with Concomitant Lower Extremity Arterial Disease and Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score Weighted Analysis.
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
Journal Volume
68
Journal Issue
4
Pages
498 - 507
ISSN
1532-2165
Date Issued
2024-10
Author(s)
Lin, Donna Shu-Han
Wu, Hsu-Ping
Chung, Wen-Jung
Hsueh, Shu-Kai
Hsu, Po-Chao
Chen, Chun-Chi
Huang, Hsuan-Li
Abstract
Patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are recommended to receive antiplatelet therapy, while direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For patients with concomitant LEAD and AF, data comparing dual antithrombotic therapy (an antiplatelet agent used in conjunction with a DOAC) vs. DOAC monotherapy are scarce. This retrospective cohort study, based on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these antithrombotic strategies.
Patients with AF who underwent revascularisation for LEAD between 2012 - 2020 and received any DOAC within 30 days of discharge were included. Patients were grouped by antiplatelet agent exposure into the dual antithrombotic therapy and DOAC monotherapy groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Major adverse limb events (MALEs), ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding outcomes were compared. Patients were followed until the occurrence of any study outcome, death, or up to two years.
A total of 1 470 patients were identified, with 736 in the dual antithrombotic therapy group and 734 in the DOAC monotherapy group. Among them, 1 346 patients received endovascular therapy as the index revascularisation procedure and 124 underwent bypass surgery. At two years, dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a higher risk of MALEs than DOAC monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 1.56), primarily driven by increased repeat revascularisation. Dual antithrombotic therapy was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.94) and gastrointestinal bleeding (SHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42 - 3.33) than DOAC monotherapy.
In patients with concomitant LEAD and AF who underwent peripheral revascularisation, DOAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MALEs and bleeding events than dual antithrombotic therapy.
Subjects
Adverse limb events
Atrial fibrillation
Bleeding
Dual antithrombotic therapy
Peripheral artery occlusive disease
Systemic embolism
SDGs
Type
journal article