Ambition versus Conscience, does Corporate Social Responsibility Pay off?- The Application of Matching Methods
Resource
Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 133-153
Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Pages
133-153
Date Issued
2009
Date
2009
Author(s)
沈中華
Abstract
In this article, we examine the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firms' financial performance (CSR-effect). Two competing hypotheses, social impact hypothesis and shift of focus hypothesis, are proposed to investigate this issue, where the former suggests that CSR has a positive relation with performance and the latter are opposite. In order to ensure the CSR-effect is not contaminated by other factors or samples are randomly drawn, we employ four matching methods, Nearest, Caliper, Mahala and Mahala Caliper to match the samples of CSR (CSR-firms) and without CSR (NonCSR-firms) with similar characteristics. Although four methods yield slightly different results, firms engaging in CSR activities tend to obtain significantly higher values on pretax income to net sales and profit margin, and adopting CSR at the very least not deteriorate the performance of firms, making our conclusion favors the social impact hypothesis and against shift of focus hypothesis in Taiwan. Thus, ambition and conscience are not conflicting with each other. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subjects
Corporate social responsibility; Matching method; Selection bias
SDGs
Type
journal article
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
14.pdf
Size
23.22 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):865c7570458d08eaa1e72047460ca933