高達美詮釋學在音樂評判衝突中的應用
Date Issued
2005-12-05
Date
2005-12-05
Author(s)
Abstract
Symphonie fantastique is judged as successful by Edward T. Cone, but is reproached by the nineteenth-century critic Franz Brendel as deprived of beauty. Does this judgmental clash mean that at least one of the critics is wrong? In case if we accept one of the two judgments, is it necessary to reject the other? If not, how can such a judgmental clash be understood and incorporated into our systems of intellectual acquisition, and be recognized as something other than the result of inconsistent human activity? This project will apply Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutics as explored in his book Wahrheit und Methode to the above musical interpretations and judgments. The purpose is to explain how conflicts of musical value judgments and interpretations can be viewed and integrated, without falling into the trap of “every goes.” In so doing, Berlioz’s Symphonie fantastique will be analyzed in detail respectively under the aesthetic perspectives of the two critics.
Subjects
music value judgment
music analysis
music aesthetics
Gadamer
Berlioz
hermeneutics
SDGs
Publisher
臺北市：國立臺灣大學音樂學研究所
Description
計畫年度：92;起迄日期：2003-08-01/2005-07-31
Type
report
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
922411H002071.pdf
Size
402.59 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):8cd068deb7ce318ff02b80c2671f2934