Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Medicine / 醫學院
  3. School of Medicine / 醫學系
  4. Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones
 
  • Details

Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones

Journal
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Journal Volume
72
Journal Issue
6
Pages
1154-1162
Date Issued
2010
Author(s)
WEI-CHIH LIAO  
Lee C.-T.
Chang C.-Y.
Leung J.W.
Chen J.-H.
Tsai M.-C.
Lin J.-T.
MING-SHIANG WU  
HSIU-PO WANG  
DOI
10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.009
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78649509725&doi=10.1016%2fj.gie.2010.07.009&partnerID=40&md5=90da3c0895278307c1f461ba9c14c123
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/541050
Abstract
Background Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has a lower risk of hemorrhage than sphincterotomy and is easier to perform in altered/difficult anatomy. However, the sphincter of Oddi (SO) is only stretched but not cut after EPBD. Therefore, the biliary orifice is less opened, and failed stone extraction with EPBD alone occurs in up to 20% of patients. An uncut SO also may exacerbate pancreatic duct compression from edema after EPBD, and it increases the risk of pancreatitis. Objective To determine whether a longer duration for EPBD (5-minute vs conventional 1-minute) can further weaken the SO and reduce the rates of failed stone extraction and pancreatitis. Design Prospective, randomized trial. Setting Two tertiary-care referral centers. Patients This study involved 170 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones. Intervention EPBD for 1 minute (n = 86) or 5 minutes (n = 84). Main Outcome Measurements Failed stone extraction with EPBD alone and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Results Failed stone extraction with EPBD alone was less frequent with 5-minute EPBD (6 of 84, 7.1%) than with 1-minute EPBD (17 of 86, 19.8%), with a relative risk (RR) of 0.36 (P = .024). The risk of pancreatitis was also lower with 5-minute EPBD (4 of 84, 4.8%) than with 1-minute EPBD (13 of 86, 15.1%), with an RR of 0.32 (P = .038). Multivariable logistic regression analyses reaffirmed that 5-minute EPBD reduced the risk of failure with EPBD alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, P = .010) and pancreatitis (OR 0.28, P = .035). Limitations Endoscopists could not be blinded after the dilation durations were randomly assigned. Conclusion Compared with conventional 1-minute EPBD, 5-minute EPBD improves efficacy of stone extraction and reduces the risk of pancreatitis. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00451581) ? 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG3

Other Subjects
amylase; triacylglycerol lipase; adult; aged; amylase blood level; article; balloon dilatation; cholangitis; cholecystitis; clinical trial; common bile duct stone; controlled clinical trial; controlled study; double blind procedure; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; female; human; major clinical study; male; Oddi sphincter; pancreatitis; priority journal; prospective study; randomized controlled trial; risk factor; tertiary health care; treatment duration; treatment failure; triacylglycerol lipase blood level; Adult; Aged; Balloon Dilation; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gallstones; Humans; Lithotripsy; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatitis; Prospective Studies; Retreatment; Risk; Risk Factors; Treatment Failure
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science