文化治理的空間政治與基礎設施化：台北市藝文場所的轉變
Other Title
The Spatial Politics and Infrastructurization of Cultural Governance: The Transformation of Art and Culture Venues in the Taipei City
Journal
第十屆發展研究年會 台灣經驗2.0：在地與全球的發展研究與實踐
Journal Issue
2018
Start Page
553
End Page
580
Date Issued
2018-10
Author(s)
高郁婷
Abstract
本文以文化基礎設施及其構成之領域化、部署、紋理和皺褶等概念，解說台北市藝文場所的空間政治意涵。參照戰後迄今台北市文化治理邏輯的變遷，作者首先歸納藝文場所的發展趨勢：（1）建築形式從中華傳統轉變為現代主義風格，再擴展到閒置空間再利用脈絡下的歷史樣式與在地形式；（2）空間分布從城市舊核心往郊區及東區擴展；（3）經營形式由國家主導的專用館舍，轉變為民間創制的替代性藝文空間及委外營運的公私協力架構；（4）與周遭街區的關係，從疏遠區隔轉變為貼近雜混；（5）地方意義與功能定位逐漸從作為品味區劃場域、文化物神及展演地景，轉化為經濟舞台與公共領域，從而具有皺褶異托邦的特質。接著，作者以實際案例討論不同藝文場所的特徵，包括依憑領域化邏輯的大型場館、轉生再部署的歷史建築再利用，以及既有紋理中冒現的縐褶擾動，構成文化治理的空間政治動態。作者主張，相較於興建大型地標館舍，都市文化治理需要容許更多激發可能性的皺褶，鋪展出基礎設施化的文化生活網絡。
This article expounds the spatial and political significance of the art and cultural spaces of Taipei City through notions of territorialization, deployment, and folding. We illustrate several dimensions of the evolution of these spaces: (1) The architectural forms of these spaces shift away from Chinese orthodoxy to modernist style, and then to styles specific to historical periods and places, as shown by the adaptively reused spaces; (2)Art and cultural spaces of the early period aggregated at the old city center, but gradually new ones appear at the suburb or the eastern district; (3) The state firstly dominated the management of the early function-specific spaces, yet new alternative spaces tend to depend on bottom-up initiation, as well as public-private partnerships on contract-out basis; (4) The relationship between the spaces and their surroundings are becoming more crisscrossed and intimate rather than alienated; (5) While the meanings and functions of these spaces were firstly more about arenas of taste differentiation, cultural fetishes, and performative landscape, increasingly they become an economic stage or public sphere, and as a result folding heterotopia. The authors then discuss different cases to embody the aforementioned traits: the flagship facilities that go with explicit territorialized logics, the adaptively reused historical buildings under redeployment that witness a reincarnation, and the foldings that stir the given textures. These different cases together embody the dynamics of spatial politics of cultural governance. The author argues that, rather than focusing on landmark flagship facilities, urban cultural governance should give more tolerance to foldings that tend to trigger possibilities, and that it is by doing so an infrastructurized network of cultural life might come into being.
Subjects
文化政策
文化治理
空間政治
基礎設施
領域化
cultural policy
cultural governance
spatial politics
infrastructure
territorialization
Type
conference paper