Intermittent use of biologic agents for the treatment of psoriasis in adults
Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
Journal Volume
35
Journal Issue
2
Date Issued
2021-02
Author(s)
Abstract
Current clinical recommendations suggest that continuous treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis with biologic agents is more effective than intermittent treatment in terms of achieving remission and maintaining it. Intermittent treatment, however, may provide an alternative approach in patients unwilling or unable to maintain a continuous regimen, such as those who would prefer a 'treatment vacation' after achieving long-term remission, those who require treatment cessation owing to adverse events, and where insurance arrangements do not provide sufficient cover for continuous treatment. We conducted a literature search of PubMed to identify publications reporting data on the efficacy and safety of intermittent treatment with biologic agents in adults with psoriasis, specifically the use of inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept and infliximab), interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 (ustekinumab), IL-23 (guselkumab) and IL-17 (brodalumab, ixekizumab and secukinumab). From our search, we identified 18 relevant publications reporting the intermittent use of the biologic therapies of interest: five described etanercept, three described adalimumab, two each described infliximab, ixekizumab or ustekinumab, and one each described certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, brodalumab and secukinumab. In general, there were large proportions of patients (≥60%) who were able to re-establish disease control (as defined by each study) following re-treatment, and the safety profiles of the various agents during re-treatment were as anticipated from their profiles observed during continuous dosing. The exception to these general findings was infliximab, which showed the lowest rate of efficacy-endpoint achievement (25% and 38% in two dosing groups evaluated) as well as a higher incidence of adverse infusion reactions compared with continuous dosing. In conclusion, the use of biologic agents in psoriasis is changing and current clinical data suggest that intermittent treatment may provide an effective and well-tolerated option for certain patients.
SDGs
Other Subjects
adalimumab; biological product; brodalumab; certolizumab pegol; etanercept; guselkumab; infliximab; ixekizumab; methotrexate; placebo; secukinumab; ustekinumab; adalimumab; biological factor; monoclonal antibody; ustekinumab; disease control; disease seve
Type
review