Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Law / 法律學院
  3. Law / 法律學系
  4. Rights, Status, and Protection of Shareholders in Public Companies
 
  • Details

Rights, Status, and Protection of Shareholders in Public Companies

Date Issued
2008
Date
2008
Author(s)
Lin, Wei-Liang
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/179414
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to clarify the nature of shareholder’s rights, and to define their proper status in the public companies, according to this study, then to review and to make adjustments to the system of shareholder protection. Traditionally, we intuitionally view shareholder as the owner of the company. This viewpoint of property, however, is defective and questionable in theory and in practice. Therefore, inspiring by Contractual Theory, I consider that shareholder is just one of the kinds of parties who have contract with the company, as my main opinion for reviewing the concept of “shareholder.”he first part of this thesis is a brief introduction of Contractual Theory, and the discussion of nature of shareholder’s rights. Contractians hold that the company is “the nexus of contracts,” a combination of both explicit and implicit contracts. Under this theory, the differences of rights held by the shareholders and other participants are just the terms of their contracts. In a nature meaning, they are all the same; shareholders also bargain for their own interest and try to reach the balance between the parties. They invest their resources into the company for exchanging for the rights to participate in the distribution of profits, as the others do. Therefore, their rights are due to their negotiations, not inherent ones from the property they have ever owned.he second part is the discussion of the status of shareholder, which is divided into 2 sections. First, we review the “shareholder wealth maximization norm,” and then the concept of “shareholder as the owner of the company.” This thesis takes the viewpoint that the company entity shall exist for their own purpose, not for the service for any participants, such as shareholders. This means that shareholder wealth maximization should not be regarded as a statutory norm, but understood in the context of the unique enterprise culture. Outside of the contractual obligations and statutory requirements, the company is free to decide to what extent of corporate social responsibility it would like to take. And its culture should be tested by the taste of market, not the government.hough, theoretically, shareholder is better protected by the way of “ownership relationship” than “contractual relationship,” this claim is hardly sustained after taking account of the shareholding structure of the public companies, that is, the dispersion of shareholders. Most of them don’t view themselves as the “owners” and are passive to the affairs of company. Even though the controlling shareholders have better incentives to monitor the management, they may become another hard-controlled power axis, if we over-emphasize their function and empower them. In conclusion, it’s not appropriate to define shareholder as the owner of the company, after all they can’t function that role (as a monitor of the management) well, at least in public companies.hareholder, however, still needs some but limited control means, because of the specialty of their contracts. In this idea, shareholder could be viewed as ONE of the mechanisms of corporate governance, which achieve the function of owner altogether. In this chapter, rights to vote, to transfer, to bring the suit, and access to the information are all critical and important, and effective on different kinds of shareholders. For the changing figure of shareholders, the system of shareholder protection should also be made certain adjustments, including the dimensions in (a) the nature of the company, (b) shareholder activism, (c) general meeting, (d) controlling shareholders, and (e) derivative suit.
Subjects
status of shareholder
separation of ownership and control
Contractual Theory
Nexus of Contracts
shareholder wealth maximization norm
shareholder primacy
owner
ownership
control
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG12

Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-97-R93a21074-1.pdf

Size

23.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):da73604d281bead15472144413cbeed1

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science