Comparative study of five different amine-derivatization methods for metabolite analyses by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
Journal
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal Volume
1610
Pages
-
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Lkhagva, A.
Shen, C.-C.
Leung, Y.-S.
HWAN-CHING TAI
Abstract
Current metabolomics research utilizes liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses to handle biological samples that contain thousands of quantifiable metabolites. However, no LC-MS/MS condition is suitable for directly analyzing all metabolites. An alternative approach is to derivatize metabolites to impart desirable properties such as better chromatographic separation, enhanced ionization efficiency, or fluorescence detection. An important category of metabolites is amine-containing compounds, which includes amino acids, neurotransmitters, alkaloids, biogenic amines, etc. Various derivatization methods have been developed for amine groups, but few studies have compared their relative strengths and weaknesses. We chose Dansyl-Cl, o-phthalaldehyde (OPA), Fmoc-Cl, Dabsyl-Cl, and Marfey's reagent to systematically compare their reactivity, absorbance, fluorescence, chromatographic separation, and ionization efficiencies under three pH conditions-2.6, 5.0, and 8.0. Their MS/MS fragmentation patterns were also examined under different collision energies. Overall, Dansyl-Cl is a very versatile derivatization method, generating products with fluorescence and high ionization efficiency. Fmoc-Cl is similarly useful under highly acidic chromatography conditions. Dabsyl-Cl may be a good alternative at weakly acidic and weakly basic conditions. OPA is a versatile fluorogenic reagent and its chemistry may be fine-tuned by incorporating different thiol molecules. Marfey's reagent is suboptimal in general, but its chiral property is useful for the separation of enantiomers. All five were applied to the analyses of Coptis chinensis, a Chinese medical herb, identifying hundreds of amine-containing metabolites through MS/MS analyses. None of the five methods is clearly superior, and their compound coverage profiles are rather distinct. A combination of multiple derivatization reagents is required for comprehensive coverage. Our comparative data provide useful guidelines for designing more efficient metabolomics experiments for different analytical goals.
Type
journal article