Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. National Development / 國家發展研究所
  4. Study of J.Y. Interpretation No.684 & the Reform of University’s Discipline in Taiwan
 
  • Details

Study of J.Y. Interpretation No.684 & the Reform of University’s Discipline in Taiwan

Date Issued
2015
Date
2015
Author(s)
Chiang, Yu-Hsin
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/274608
Abstract
J.Y. Interpretation No.684, which had modified No.382 that Justices of the Constitutional Court made before, made college students be allowed to bring administrative appeal or litigation not only for expulsions or similar decisions like No.382’s meaning but also for the decisions or measures infringing the student’s right to education or other constitutional fundamental rights. Until now, however, college students’ appeal or litigation for administrative actions made by administration in school without relevance with expulsions are still considered to be with no concern to infringing theirs’ fundamental rights and being dismissed. The Petition Reviewing Commissions or Administrative Litigation Courts thought those administrative actions were not in accord with the constitutive requirements of disciplinary sanction but they ignored the differences between substantive and procedural law . On the survey of student rights , a lot of universities in Taiwan still restrain students from basic human rights including assembly ,demonstration and the freedom of speech.   Based on the reasons above, the study starts from analyzing J.Y. Interpretation No.684 in order to seek and figure out the specific explications and defects of this interpretation. Furthermore, we focus on legal characteristics of disciplinary measures and regulations which were often ignored by theories and the possible difficulties of those measures and regulations applied to “Administrative Procedure Act” and general principles of Administration Law. Last but not least,we search for disciplinary regulations of 142 universities including public and private universities in Taiwan authorized by “University Act” Article 32 to be materials of the research with the objective to make induction and analyze these regulations from substantial and procedural constitutionality .  The study regards that the deficiency of protection of student rights about disciplinary regulations in university is caused by not distinguishing the boundary between “teaching” and “discipline”. Disciplinary regulations which have existed from “the Martial Law Period” up to now in many universities still infringe student fundamental rights. They are packaged by the term called “university self-government” and used inane “educational purpose” to be “Justification foundation”. Obviously, they are out of constitutional order in Nation, and cause considerable controversies which have yet to be improved. In the long run, the study makes the suggestion to delete “Administrative Procedure Act” Article 3.3.6 and the legislation possibility of “Student Rights Protection Fundamental Act”. After integrating the discovery from the study, we holds the opinion that putting universities’ disciplinary regulations back into “legal order” item , putting universities’ disciplinary decisions back into “administrative disposition” item, establishing the framework fundamental act by Legislative Yuan, serving justice practitioners to know how to recognize the truth and applying the laws based on the premise: “respecting the students’ rights” should be considered.
Subjects
special power relationship
J.Y. Interpretation No.684
student disciplinary regulation
Administrative Procedure Act
general principles of law
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG16

Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-104-R00341029-1.pdf

Size

23.54 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):c634eec0069a8b0608fcade306b31892

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science