Assessment and determinants of global outcomes among 445 mass-casualty burn survivors: A 2-year retrospective cohort study in Taiwan
Journal
Burns
Date Issued
2020
Author(s)
Ma H.
Tung K.-Y.
Tsai S.-L.
Neil D.L.
Ling Y.-Y.
Yen H.-T.
Lin K.-L.
Cheng Y.-T.
Kao S.-C.
Lin M.-N.
Dai N.-T.
Perng C.-K.
Chen L.-R.
Tuan Y.-C.
Lin C.-H.
Abstract
Purpose: To study outcomes among survivors of the mass-casualty powder explosion on 27 June 2015, at Formosa Fun Coast Waterpark, New Taipei City, Taiwan. Methods: Using retrospective data on Taiwanese survivors, we analyzed prehospital management, burns assessment and prognosis, functional recovery, and medical costs, followed-up through 30 June 2017. We related outcomes to burn extent, categorized according to the percentages of total body surface area with second/third-degree burns (%TBSA) or autologous split-thickness skin grafts (%STSG), and an investigational scale: f{SASG} = (%TBSA + %STSG)/2, stratified by %STSG. Analyses included casualty dispersal, comparisons between %TBSA, %STSG and f{SASG}, and their relationships with length of hospitalization, times to rehabilitation and social/school re-entry, physical/mental disability, and medical costs. We also investigated how burn scars restricting joint mobility affected rehabilitation duration. Results: 445 hospitalized casualties (excluding 16 foreigners, 23 with 0% TBSA and 15 fatalities) aged 12–38 years, had mean TBSA of 41.1%. Hospitalization and functional recovery durations correlated with %TBSA, %STSG and f{SASG} – mean length of stay per %TBSA was 1.5 days; more numerous burn scar contractures prolonged rehabilitation. Females had worse burns than males, longer hospitalization and rehabilitation, and later school/social re-entry; at follow-up, 62.3% versus 37.7% had disabilities and 57.7% versus 42.3% suffered mental trauma (all p ≤ 0.001). Disabilities affecting 225/227 people were skin-related; 34 were severely disabled but 193 had mild/moderate impairments. The prevalence of stress-related and mood disorders increased with burn extent. Treatment costs (mean USD-equivalents ∼$48,977/patient, ∼$1192/%TBSA) increased with burn severity; however, the highest %TBSA, %STSG and f{SASG} categories accounted for <10% of total costs, whereas TBSA 41–80% accounted for 73.2%. Conclusions: Besides %TBSA, skin-graft requirements and burn scar contractures are complementary determinants of medium/long-term outcomes. We recommend further elucidation of factors that influence burn survivors’ recovery, long-term physical and mental well-being, and quality of life. © 2020 The Authors
Other Subjects
adolescent; adult; Article; body surface; burn; burn scar; burn survivor; child; cohort analysis; contracture; explosion; female; follow up; functional assessment; health care cost; human; joint mobility; length of stay; major clinical study; male; mass disaster; medical record review; mood disorder; observational study; outcome assessment; physical disability; prevalence; prognosis; psychological well-being; psychotrauma; quality of life; rehabilitation; retrospective study; second degree burn; split thickness skin graft; stress; Taiwan; body surface; burn; contracture; economics; explosion; health care cost; injury scale; mental health; pathology; pathophysiology; skin transplantation; survivor; Taiwan; young adult; Adolescent; Adult; Body Surface Area; Burns; Cohort Studies; Contracture; Explosions; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Mass Casualty Incidents; Mental Health; Psychological Trauma; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Skin Transplantation; Survivors; Taiwan; Trauma Severity Indices; Young Adult
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd
Type
journal article