Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Engineering / 工學院
  3. Civil Engineering / 土木工程學系
  4. Comparison of seismic vulnerable indices by building data of the 2016 Taiwan earthquake
 
  • Details

Comparison of seismic vulnerable indices by building data of the 2016 Taiwan earthquake

Journal
11th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2018, NCEE 2018: Integrating Science, Engineering, and Policy
Journal Volume
2
Pages
1171-1180
Date Issued
2018
Author(s)
Chiou T.C
Hwang S.J
Pujol S.
SHYH-JIANN HWANG  
URI
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085583815&partnerID=40&md5=7cede2429dfed1280f2736454719a34b
https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/576080
Abstract
Hassan and Sozen [1] proposed seismic-vulnerability indices (column index CI and wall index WI), to represent the seismic vulnerability of existing reinforced concrete buildings. A threshold separating the most critical buildings from the rest was defined using field data collected after earthquakes in Turkey, Pern, Haiti, China, and Nepal. In Taiwan, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NC'REE) [2] proposed another index for preliminary seismic evaluation of low-rise RC buildings (Is) based on an estimate of the seismic capacity-to-demand ratio. Seismic capacity is assumed proportional to the building column-to-floor and wall-to floor area ratios on the basis of data from school buildings surveyed in Taiwan. Seismic demand is defined as the equivalent peak ground acceleration (EPA) of design-basis earthquake obtained from Taiwanese seismic design specifications. Following the 2016 Meinong Earthquake in Taiwan, a reconnaissance team of researchers from Purdue University and NC'REE surveyed 113 buildings in Tainan City. Data collected include structural plans and dimensions of elements, location and level of damage in elements, and architectural plans. This dataset was used to compare these two rapid-evaluation methods. Each method was independently developed by empirical calibration. Nevertheless, the comparison indicated that both methods correlate well with observed damage classifications and produce similar results. ? Copyright (2018 by Earthquake Engineering Research Institute All rights reserved.
Subjects
Concrete buildings; Engineering geology; Floors; Reinforced concrete; Seismic design; Surveys; Walls (structural partitions); Damage classification; Design specification; Empirical calibration; Evaluation methods; Existing reinforced concrete; Low-rise RC buildings; Peak ground acceleration; Seismic vulnerability; Earthquakes
Type
conference paper

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science