Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. National Development / 國家發展研究所
  4. Dynamic Analysis of Medical Regulation and Capture Theory-Managed Care in Global Budget System
 
  • Details

Dynamic Analysis of Medical Regulation and Capture Theory-Managed Care in Global Budget System

Date Issued
2007
Date
2007
Author(s)
Lin, Yuh-Chyi
DOI
zh-TW
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/57198
Abstract
This paper is to explain the procedure of policy-making about medical public affairs. First with the idea of deliberative democracy let people fairly participate and discuss. Then after argument and discussion, people find the way that can solve the problem. However it is unrealistic and impractical to appeal every issue - especially complex, technically oriented issues of National Health Insurance policy to a public process. Therefore regulatory agency (Department of Health) establishes institutional review board (IRB) as inner supervision arrangement. Through the commission negotiation, government settles the impact of vary interest groups. Residents, users of medical resource, urge government make the best policy that they want. Though the medical resource, those will be shared to people equally and justly, belong to country estate, the medical providers not only deliver professional medical care, but also help users allocate and make the best of the medical resource. While IRB function is failure, courts of justice department act as external supervision arrangement. Through decision and justice review, they can correct the arbitrary and abusive discretion of executive agencies. This paper was written and described from the positive aspect. Retrospectively it initiated the beginning by the issue of government failure and argued the capture theory of regulation. Then it explained the background about lose control of the social insurance and checked regulation entity, ideal of the social welfare, and conflict between public benefits and medical managed care in global budget system. If regulation not fit with requirement of democracy process, unavoidably the interest group will grasp private benefit in the name of public goods. A reasonable healthcare system grants doctor do his best and deliver perfect medical care as possibly. However the current healthcare policies designed by medical imperialism lead to a manner of corruption because doctors more care their income than benefit of the patient. Even if the radiography is considered not definitely harmful in the dentistry and the other image diagnosis of medicine, in the healthcare system we can not offer the incentives that persuade doctors give up their professional attitude with which they do best for the patient. If there are unjust incentives in the wake of medical commercialization and formalization, finally doctors will abuse radiography and providers will be encouraged to overuse unnecessary radiation. Therefore in the last half of this paper specially considered are issues related to policy-making of which medical imperialism takes no account. Substantially there are issues involved with myth of peer review, informed consent, protection of patient private right and privacy autonomy. Through practice of medical lawsuit and analysis of secondary generation National Health Insurance, we can understand there are some spaces in these for further progress in the future. This paper describes due process and four institutional review boards in the Department of Health, Taiwan. Because medical imperialism takes over the commission, justice review, external supervision arrangement, acts as gatekeepers of National Health Insurance. However there are special social context with external and inner supervision arrangements. Therefore it is vain for both supervision arrangements to correct market and government failure. This paper accents a standard procedure of policy-making about medical public affairs. With deliberative democracy and both supervision arrangements the idea of social welfare will come true.
Subjects
審議式民主
全民健康保險
牙醫
告知後同意
俘虜理論
管理式醫療
social welfare
deliberative democracy
National Health Insurance
dentistry
informed consent
government regulation
capture theory
managed care
SDGs

[SDGs]SDG16

Type
thesis
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-96-P93341018-1.pdf

Size

23.53 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):3d07ddb66c29633d507e4ff1d28e5425

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science