No difference in oncological outcomes and perioperative complications between patients with ESRD with unilateral and bilateral UTUC receiving radical nephroureterectomy.
Journal
Scientific reports
Journal Volume
14
Journal Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
Date Issued
2024-08-01
Author(s)
Lin, Tsu-Chen
Chen, Guan-Heng
Yeh, Chin-Chung
Ke, Hung-Lung
Li, Wei-Ming
Tsai, Yao-Chou
Wu, Shu-Yu
Lin, Wun-Rong
Chen, Marcelo
Lo, Shih-Hsiu
Pang, See-Tong
Lin, Po-Hung
Abstract
Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of developing upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Due to high recurrence rate of UTUC in contralateral kidney and ureter, and high risk of complications related to surgery and anesthesia, whether it's necessary to remove both kineys and ureters at one time remains in debate. We utilized Taiwanese UTUC Registry Database to valuate the difference of oncological outcomes and perioperative complications between patients with ESRD with unilateral and bilateral UTUC receiving surgical resection. Patients with ESRD and UTUC were divided into three groups, unilateral UTUC, previous history of unilateral UTUC with metachronous contralateral UTUC, and concurrent bilatetral UTUC. Oncological outcomes, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stays were investiaged. We found that there is no diffence of oncological outcomes including overall survival, cancer specific survival, disease free survival and bladder recurrence free survival between these three groups. Complication rate and length of hospital stay are similar. Adverse oncological features such as advanced tumor stage, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margin would negatively affect oncological outcomes.
Subjects
End stage renal disease
Oncological outcomes
Preventive nephroureterctomy
Radical nephroureterectomy
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Type
journal article