A Two-Stage Design for Multiple Testing in Large-Scale Association Studies
Resource
JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS v.51 n.6 pp.523-532
Journal
JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Journal Volume
v.51
Journal Issue
n.6
Pages
523-532
Date Issued
2006
Date
2006
Author(s)
WEN, SHU-HUI
TZENG, JUNG-YING
KAO, JAU-TSUEN
HSIAO, CHUHSING K.
Abstract
Modern association studies often involve a large number of markers and hence may encounter the problem of testing multiple hypotheses. Traditional procedures are usually over -conservative and with low power to detect mild genetic effects. From the design perspective, we propose a two-stage selection procedure to address this concern. Our main principle is to reduce the total number of tests by removing clearly unassociated markers in the first-stage test. Next, conditional on the findings of the first stage, which uses a less stringent nominal level, a more conservative test is conducted in the second stage using the augmented data and the data from the first stage. Previous studies have suggested using independent samples to avoid inflated errors . However, we found that, after accounting for the dependence between these two samples, the true discovery rate increases substantially. In addition, the cost of genotyping can be greatly reduced via this approach. Results from a study of hypertriglyceridemia and simulations suggest the two-stage method has a higher overall true positive rate (TPR) with a controlled overall false positive rate (FPR) when compared with single-stage approaches. We also report the analytical form of its overall FPR, which may be useful in guiding study design to achieve a high TPR while retaining the desired FPR .
Subjects
association studies
cost-effectiveness
false positive rate
multiple testing
two-stage design