Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences / 社會科學院
  3. Political Science / 政治學系
  4. European Integration between 1958 and 1969: A Theoretical Debate
 
  • Details

European Integration between 1958 and 1969: A Theoretical Debate

Resource
政治科學論叢, 46, 31-70
Journal
政治科學論叢
Journal Issue
46
Pages
31-70
Date Issued
2010-12
Date
2010-12
Author(s)
蘇宏達  
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/281647
Abstract
During the first twelve years after entry into effect of Rome Treaties in 1958, the then European Communities succeeded in establishing their first common policies, completing the customs union, and unifying administrative bodies. At the same time however, European leaders failed to constitute a political union, enlarge the Communities to the United Kingdom and establish the majority vote in the Council of Ministers. All scholars agree that European integration of this period was heavily influenced by the French President, De Gaulle’s European policy, which was ingeneral explained with reference to the classical realism, De Gaulle based its European policy upon French raison d’Etat and would like to have restructured the European Communities into a unified political entity under French leadership. This classical realist interpretation was later challenged by several integration theories which emerged since the mid 1980s. Liberal intergovernmentalism put into doubt the assumption that state leaders alone decided and formulated national interests. Neofunctionalism and institutionalism both criticized realism for underestimating the importance of supranational institutions and their leaders in the European integration. The author therefore aims to reevaluate the classical realist interpretation of European integration between 1958 and 1969 and examine the abovementioned criticism against this interpretation before drawing into some conclusions. According to the author’s findings, classical realism still prevails over the intergovernmentalism, neofunctionalism and institutionalism in the explanation of successes and frustrations of European integration between 1958-1969, though it should have paid more attention to the power of perception as required by sociological institutionalism and constructivism.
Subjects
歐洲聯盟;統合理論;戴高樂;共同市場;European Union;Integration Theory;De Gaulle;Common Market
Type
journal article

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science