Multiple comparison of different noninvasive brain stimulation and pharmacologic interventions in patients with methamphetamine use disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Journal
Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
Journal Volume
76
Journal Issue
12
Pages
633
Date Issued
2022-12
Author(s)
Wu, Ming-Kung
Satogami, Kazumi
Liang, Chih-Sung
Stubbs, Brendon
Carvalho, Andre F
Brunoni, Andre R
Su, Kuan-Pin
Wu, Yi-Cheng
Chen, Tien-Yu
Li, Dian-Jeng
Lin, Pao-Yen
Hsu, Chih-Wei
Chen, Yen-Wen
Suen, Mein-Woei
Zeng, Bing-Yan
Takahashi, Shun
Tseng, Ping-Tao
Li, Cheng-Ta
Abstract
In recent decades, the prevalence of amphetamine and methamphetamine use disorders has at least doubled in some regions/countries, with accompanying high risks of drug overdose-associated mortality. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods may be effective treatments. However, the comparative efficacy of the NIBS protocol for amphetamine/methamphetamine use disorder (AUD/MUD) remains unknown to date. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of various NIBS methods/protocols for AUD/MUD management.
Subjects
craving; methamphetamine abstinence; methamphetamine use disorder; network meta-analysis; non-invasive brain stimulation
SDGs
Publisher
WILEY
Type
journal article