Gaseous mercury re-emission from wet flue gas desulfurization wastewater aeration basins: A review
Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
420
Date Issued
2021
Author(s)
Abstract
Wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) simultaneously removes Hg and SO2 from coal-fired power plant flue gas streams. Hg0 re-emission occurs when the dissolved Hg(II) is converted to a volatile form (i.e., Hg0) that can be subsequently emitted into the ambient air from WFGD wastewater aeration basins. Others have shown that Hg0 re-emission depends on pH, temperature, ligands (Cl, Br, I, F, SO32-, SO42-, NO3-, SCN-, and ClO-), O2, minerals (Se and As), and metals (Fe and Cu) in WFGD wastewater. Still others have shown Hg0 re-emission restriction via inhibitor addition (adsorbents and precipitators). This is the first review that summarizes the complex and inconsistently reported Hg0 re-emission mechanisms, updates misconceptions related to Hg(II) complexation and reduction, and reviews applications of inhibitors that convert aqueous Hg(II) into stable solid forms to prevent gaseous Hg0 formation and release. ? 2021 Elsevier B.V.
Subjects
Coal-fired power plant
Flue gas desulfurization
Mercury
Re-emission
Coal fueled furnaces
Desulfurization
Flue gases
Flues
Fossil fuel power plants
Gas plants
Mercury (metal)
Mercury compounds
Mining
Aeration basins
Flue gas desulphurization
Gas streams
Gaseous mercury
SO$-2$
Wastewater aeration
Wet flue gas desulfurization
Coal
activated carbon
arsenic
barium
carbon nanotube
copper
ferrous gluconate
iron
mercury
metal
mineral
nitrate
nitric oxide
oxygen
selenium oxide
sodium sulfide
sulfur trioxide
unclassified drug
coal
aeration
coal-fired power plant
emission
gas
literature review
mercury (element)
wastewater treatment
ambient air
chemical reaction
complex formation
crystal structure
desulfurization
electric power plant
exhaust gas
flue gas
human
pH
Review
temperature
waste water management
wastewater
wet flue gas desulfurization
air pollutant
Air Pollutants
Gases
Power Plants
Waste Water
Type
review