Repository logo
  • English
  • 中文
Log In
Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Management / 管理學院
  3. Accounting / 會計學系
  4. Fraud Risks Management by Auditors - A Case Study on Procomp
 
  • Details

Fraud Risks Management by Auditors - A Case Study on Procomp

Date Issued
2007
Date
2007
Author(s)
Huang, Hui-Chuan
DOI
zh-TW
URI
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw//handle/246246/61677
Abstract
  Frauds are often mentioned in the news today, and most involve fraudulent financial statements and asset misappropriations. These frauds had resulted in instability of stock markets development and caused significant losses to immense stakeholders. Amidst these, the auditing profession also suffered from reputation losses, as well as faced with increased exposure to litigation and greater scrutiny. As such, this research used Procomp Case as an example to examine how auditors can manage fraud risks through complying with the guidelines relating to identification and assessment of the risks of material misstatement due to fraud (including considerations of unusual or unexpected relationships and fraud risk factors), and determination of responses to address the assessed fraud risks as specified in local Statements of Auditing Standards No. 43 “The Auditor’s Responsibility to Consider Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements”, in order to increase audit quality and reduce audit risks.   Based on the considerations of identified Procomp Case’s unusual or unexpected relationships and fraud risk factors, the following overall responses are recommended: 1. Exercise increased professional skepticism and involve more general considerations apart from the planned specific procedures throughout the audit. 2. Appropriate assignment and supervision of personnel involved in the audit engagement, particularly the increased involvement of the audit engagement partner taking a lead throughout the audit. 3. Test the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls. 4. Consider the accounting policies and estimates used by the entity for biases. 5. Incorporate an element of unpredictability in the selection of the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures. 6. Complete all necessary audit procedures and obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to support the audit report by the report date. 7. Refuse to accept unreasonable reporting deadlines.   Based on the considerations of identified Procomp Case’s unusual or unexpected relationships and fraud risk factors, the following audit procedures responses at the assertion level are recommended: 1. Make confirmations with all corresponding financial institutions and ensure the direct receipt of all returned confirmations by auditors. 2. Test the business rationale of significant cash movements that are outside the normal course of business or that appear to be unusual. 3. Obtain an understanding of the entity’s major suppliers and customers. 4. Visit the entity’s major suppliers and customers. 5. Test the appropriateness of accounting for significant disposals of accounts receivable. 6. Evaluate the provision for doubtful accounts. 7. Perform tests of inventory counts. 8. Evaluate the provision for inventory valuation.   To response to risks of management override of controls, the following audit procedures are recommended: 1. Test the appropriateness of journal entries. 2. Review accounting estimates for management biases. 3. Understand the business rationale of significant transactions that are outside the normal course of business or that appear to be unusual.   When performing the additional audit procedures recommended above, the auditors need to constantly maintain an increased attitude of professional skepticism and exercise professional judgment at all stages of the audit to ensure the audit objectives are achieved. Nevertheless, due to the inherent limitations of an audit in the context of fraud, there is an unavoidable risk that the auditors may not detect some material misstatements of the financial statements even though they have properly planned and performed the audit in accordance with Statements of Auditing Standards.
Subjects
舞弊
舞弊風險因子
審計風險
審計準則公報第43號
查核程序
Fraud
Fraud Risk Factors
Audit Risk
SAS 43
Audit Procedures
Type
other
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

ntu-96-R92722050-1.pdf

Size

23.31 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum

(MD5):1180cdee1a5e6ad93ee68099f8e360e1

臺大位居世界頂尖大學之列,為永久珍藏及向國際展現本校豐碩的研究成果及學術能量,圖書館整合機構典藏(NTUR)與學術庫(AH)不同功能平台,成為臺大學術典藏NTU scholars。期能整合研究能量、促進交流合作、保存學術產出、推廣研究成果。

To permanently archive and promote researcher profiles and scholarly works, Library integrates the services of “NTU Repository” with “Academic Hub” to form NTU Scholars.

總館學科館員 (Main Library)
醫學圖書館學科館員 (Medical Library)
社會科學院辜振甫紀念圖書館學科館員 (Social Sciences Library)

開放取用是從使用者角度提升資訊取用性的社會運動,應用在學術研究上是透過將研究著作公開供使用者自由取閱,以促進學術傳播及因應期刊訂購費用逐年攀升。同時可加速研究發展、提升研究影響力,NTU Scholars即為本校的開放取用典藏(OA Archive)平台。(點選深入了解OA)

  • 請確認所上傳的全文是原創的內容,若該文件包含部分內容的版權非匯入者所有,或由第三方贊助與合作完成,請確認該版權所有者及第三方同意提供此授權。
    Please represent that the submission is your original work, and that you have the right to grant the rights to upload.
  • 若欲上傳已出版的全文電子檔,可使用Open policy finder網站查詢,以確認出版單位之版權政策。
    Please use Open policy finder to find a summary of permissions that are normally given as part of each publisher's copyright transfer agreement.
  • 網站簡介 (Quickstart Guide)
  • 使用手冊 (Instruction Manual)
  • 線上預約服務 (Booking Service)
  • 方案一:臺灣大學計算機中心帳號登入
    (With C&INC Email Account)
  • 方案二:ORCID帳號登入 (With ORCID)
  • 方案一:定期更新ORCID者,以ID匯入 (Search for identifier (ORCID))
  • 方案二:自行建檔 (Default mode Submission)
  • 方案三:學科館員協助匯入 (Email worklist to subject librarians)

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science